1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Chelsea comparison

Discussion in 'Arsenal' started by Gooners Eleven, Sep 4, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BackStabbed

    BackStabbed Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    1,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeh arsenal are much superior.... that's why they haven't won a trophy in 7 years and couldn't even beat birmingham in the carling cup final, and yeh great keeper scezney is ...what other keeper lets in 8 goals against man u... definitely the worlds best, please let us swap teams with you please we don't want any trophies ever again and we want to lose 8-2 to man u and lose a carling cup final to birmingham ha ha.
    And walcotts probably one of the most over-rated players in the world, take away his speed his as good as snodgrass.
     
    #21
  2. Sanj

    Sanj Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    19,108
    Likes Received:
    891
    Did his speed get those 13 goals last season?
     
    #22
  3. BackStabbed

    BackStabbed Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    1,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    Most likely because without his burst of speed he wouldn't have nothing to his game, Saloman Kalou is one of our worst players and even he managed 12 goals last season... 1 shy of walcott
     
    #23
  4. Sanj

    Sanj Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    19,108
    Likes Received:
    891
    The burst of speed, then what. Oh right his ability to score goals. You cleary do not watch much of Walcott. Because if you did you will see that he is a very intelligent player off the ball. Makes runs from out to in with perfect timing. He knows when to do that because you can see that nautrally he is a forward. His wing play is not the best and that is why people do not rate him. But that wing play only gets exposed when he played for England. The 4-4-2 and Walcott on the right was a massive flop for England and Walcott. At Arsenal he is a wide forward who is allowed to cut in and therefore able to score goals. At England he is asked to stay out wide and cross. Walcott is never going to be able to play that role. In the mean time he is a very good wing forward for us and has scored 2 massive goals in our season against Udinese.

    Without the speed, he would still have his natural ability infront of goal. When one on one the guy has a very cool head and you can see that is what he did as a kid. I have no doubts that we will see Walcott move to the middle. Probaly with Van Persie behind him in a number 10 role.
     
    #24
  5. TheEssExpress

    TheEssExpress Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    204
    Likes Received:
    0
    So Arsenal's players are all better than Chelsea's I wonder why Chelsea are a better team than Arsenal then?

    Arsenal have much more to worry about than the fact that they aren't as good as Chelsea. They need to worry about how far off the top four they are going to finish this season. Eight points off the lead after only three games with ten goals conceded that's what you need to be worrying about.
     
    #25
  6. - SW6 -

    - SW6 - Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    8,349
    Likes Received:
    89
    Jesus Christ, is this for real?
     
    #26
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page