Rolf was a proven ****phile with numerous cases played against him. Ched has one drunken night and a massive mistake no doubt, but I am not sure he is a "rapist" - especially if the girl cannot remember anything..... Still don't know how you get done for rape if the girl cannot remember anything? It's a bit " Yeah he definitely raped me...I think...not sure... I can't quite remember" lol
rubbish, if he was a taxi driver or window cleaner she wouldn't have bothered making any complaint. This is about money, pure and simple. here's what probably happende She got a little drunk, nowhere near enough to lose her memory for a day as she claims, she slutted herself about a bit, then went home, not to a police station. She told her friend who told her she could make a load of money, she turns up at the police station, she doesn't say she has been raped, she pretends she can't remember, that way she can't trip herself up with her story. Police want to lord it over a footballer, footballer says the wrong thing during interview and prosecution twist his "I'm a Pro footballer, I have no trouble picking up girls for ex' to make him look predatory, rather than a person targetted by money scrubbers. The others got 'off' despite having sex with her first when she would have been the the most inebriated. It's all about the money
Seen the video and read her tweets, not a missed step in the CCTV and the day he got charged she was celebrating her 'big win' and offering her friend holidays and matching pink minis, not the actions of a traumatised victim. She then tried to delete and hide them, but there's always a cache file somewhere and a hacker who was interested in the civil liberty aspect of the case regarding the internet hacked the cache file of twitter and released them, the jury never saw or heard reference to them as they were 'inadmissable' due to the nature of how they were obtained. How many times have you, in all honesty, been so drunk you have no recollection at all of 8 hours? It's a convenient excuse and a story that is almost impossible to disprove. "I can't remember" the easiest get out to excuse your behaviour there is. I
There seems to be shift in many public views on Evans' case For eg. http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...rHgdAI&usg=AFQjCNFooMjj6XmRBo1RsJw3ziUWoVYtqA
I agree. Having done jury service it seemed to me that unless you were absolutely sure that the case was proven, you were obliged to vote for not guilty. Head over heart I would think in lots of cases.
To put things into perspective, Evans put his cock in some old slappers well worn fanny and got unlucky. Hughes actually killed. What the **** is wrong with the world today.
Still no one has commented about the above points that is actually in the case notes (and not made up). Surely if you see these facts, you too would be wondering how he was found guilty!! He is a massive twat for cheating on his missus. I hate cheats. But a rapist?? I dont think so.
The video.... http://www.chedevans.com/judge-for-yourself Read the info as well below the video The tweets.... http://www.chedevans.com/the-disputed-tweets McDonalds interview.... http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/new...on-mcdonald-midland-footballer-speaks-6788373 The trial.... http://www.chedevans.com/the-trial Key FACTS.... http://www.chedevans.com/key-and-undisputed-facts
FGR have said they wouldnt sign Evans well thats very hypocritical of them! I guess signing a murderer is less of a crime in their eyes! Our club didnt respond according to this... https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B676KFcCUAEs6Pr.jpg
