So what was said differently to the last trial? Did the girls ex swing it? Do they go for best out of three? At the end of the day that girls someone's daughter!
"The appeal was allowed after judges gave the go-ahead for two former sexual partners of the alleged victim to give explicit evidence in court about her sex life".
So it would seem SB, he does however continue to be guilty of being a disgusting, lowlife specimin of humanity ..... I bet his parents are really proud of him.
I think the parents of all three will be equally embarrassed by their offspring. Bet they still love 'em though.
I fail to see what possible relevance any past sexual relations have to do with it. She could be the loosest lass on the planet, it doesn't mean she can't be raped.
It has obviously swayed the jury's mind on this occasion! Like I say it's someone's daughter at the end of the day! But I'm sure we've all done things drunk we regret! And Evans will regret that night for the rest of his life.
You say that as if she's still in some way a victim. The current situation is that she made false allegations against a man and he served two and half years in prison for a crime he didn't commit.
It wasn't that. She had claimed she was drugged and couldn't remember anything. Yet her previous partners described her actions and attitude to sex exactly as Evans had in his first statement to the police. Though the morals and behaviour of all three isn't what any of our kids to have. Three asylum seekers have just get let off a charge in Newcastle because of discrepancies in what the translator wrote (I bet their English is pretty good when it suits. They had engaged 14 year old lasses in conversation and I assume they weren't fluid in Arabic) and it being said the lasses had previously being economical with the truth. Still was a technicality that got them off though. That is hailed by sympathisers in the comments sections in the papers as a triumph for justice. Funny how things are looked at differently.
Exactly. Wonder if anything will happen to her for false allegations, perjury...My guess is it won''t.
Something must have happened for her to take the action she has? If she's been a bit of a lass in the past? I can imagine she'd have been offered money from Evans legal team if that's what's been on her mind! And I'll stick by the my words " she's someone's daughter" thanks all the same
Okay say he offered her money, she took it then blackmailed him for more threatening to take it court if he doesn't pay, how would he explain that first payment to the court if he was innocent? He'd look guilty as hell. His legal team knew he was innocent and weren't stupid enough to risk his future by offering money to make her go away. What is the point in having a court and jury if people like you are not going to accept its verdict? Right now you're defending someone that has lied under oath because you hold some personal belief that she's a victim. Meanwhile an innocent man lost two and half years of his life and you still believe him to be a criminal. It is scary that people like you are able to serve on a jury.
Given you're the one incapable of formulating a valid or even plausible argument for your willing ignorance, I'd say that post was rather hypocritical. I hope no one close to you is ever falsely accused of rape, they certainly wouldn't get much support from you.
So what happens if she's attacked one night & raped sometime in the future? Her word against the rapist! Do they pull out all the her ex blokes To say she's game? If you read my post I wasn't defending her! I was making the point that something must have happened for to act differently to how she's been in the past?