I've answered that in my op... There's a really good 1st 11 and probably a 2nd 11 that would Defo be good enough for a top 3 finish as a min. Probably about 10 to cull and rest out on loan. Celtic , imo, only need 3 signings for progress A striker better than griffiths A younger fitter commons type A versatile defender Rangers , imp, are adding at least 6 players , but if ye end up in Europe , then you'd need to add another 2 to 3 on top of that... Especially centre backs .
You would do well to get a striker better than Griffiths. You will need a goal scorer of similar stature though. The fact Griffiths went through the last season without missing many games was a big plus for Celtic because currently they have no one that can step in and score the goals he scores. A decent centre half is a must. Should be top priority tbh. You have talent that's not been used in the middle of the park. A good left sided winger wouldn't go amiss. Left back could prove an even bigger problem. Izzy has gone and, if CFC are true to form, Tierney may follow. I agree with you Rangers need at least 6 quality signings but i think Celtic do to. Rangers are already well into their transfer dealings. Celtic are currently doing not a lot of anything.
Hopefully a new manager is in within a week , 10 days tops Simonovic will be the new CB ... Once he's over his injury Yer probably right , as tierney will need back up , he'll not be sold just yet unless someone offers silly money 3 is a minimum , but 6 would be good ... Next season could be a belter ... Celtic Aberdeen hearts n Rangers , all likely to be in a position to take points off each other
You just think that because you give them no credit Mindy. What was your prediction for the semi final again? Silly bhoy
Just now ... Maybe But based on what I've seen from them , they'll Defo beat premiership teams . I don't think they can be ignored and Celtic need to watch them and help out new manager identify targets that keep us the top side in Scotland . And if they sign players like dorrans and Cummings , on top of the guy rossiter (that looks like great business) then , if they add the same level or above then they will be a team that will take points off the top 3 .
Seems you are buying the Hype, I'll put it bluntly, apart from Wallace I would not take any of the current Rangers team, none of them would get a game for Celtic at this time. Maybe Rangers will add some quality in the close season but at present they have no better a squad than Hearts and we have a vastly superior squad to Hearts.
Because they have a very lean squad. Far too lean tbh. We were missing a 30 goal striker.O'Hoolligan and King were cup tied and we had a 17 year old on the bench. Still managed to out play and ultimately defeat your vastly superior team though. Think it's you that is believing the hype mate.
A "very lean" squad? In other words Celtic have a far stronger squad with multiple players for each position. That's pretty much what I said at the start.
No it's not. You said in terms of quantity and QUALITY celtic have a vastly superior squad. While i agree that the quantity is there in the Celtic squad i don't honestly see the vastly superior quality and to be fair there has been very little evidence of it this season. And btw i don't base my assertions on "the hype". I have watched nearly every game Rangers have played this season. I have also watched quite a few Celtic games. I am.commenting on what i have sèen and whilst Celtic are probably the better team.at the moment there is not a lot in it and there is certainly no vast gap between the two teams.
