Celtic Re-Instated

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
At least we will have the pleasure of C****c being thrashed again in the next round.
 
They should be ashamed to even write to UEFA to get re-instated.

Hope they get absolutely bummed in the groups
 
Its not corrupt. The stupidity of Warsaw putting on an ineligible sub in the last three minutes when they had the tie won. Would you still considerate corrupt if Leeds were in Celtics position? Oh hang on we were and we were happy to progress
 
I think Celtic should be too embarrassed to go through to the next round - completely out of their depth!!
 
Who made the mistake, surely someone, even the player should have been aware.

"Errr boss, you can't put me on, i'm banned don't forget"

Someone, somewhere, will currently be being taken out and shot!!

As for Celtic, rules or no rules, i'd be embarrassed to progress after a 6-1 agrregate defeat.
 
Of course we'd all be embarrassed to write the letter to UEFA!! WTF would we do with £20m?

Get real. Commercial decision that any club would make. We'd be up in arms if Leeds didn't.
 
Yep they did T C.

Jock, my point is, if i was a fan of Celtic i'd be embarrassed to progress to the next round after a 6-1 aggregate loss. The player was on for a matter of minutes and made no difference whatsoever to the outcome of the tie, and my honest opinion is there should be a one-off replay.

Rules may be rules, bit it seems a tad harsh to me. <ok>
 
RCDM said:
Yep they did T C.

Jock, my point is, if i was a fan of Celtic i'd be embarrassed to progress to the next round after a 6-1 aggregate loss. The player was on for a matter of minutes and made no difference whatsoever to the outcome of the tie, and my honest opinion is there should be a one-off replay.

Rules may be rules, bit it seems a tad harsh to me. <ok>
Click to expand...

May well be, what other option is there?
 
RCDM said:
Who made the mistake, surely someone, even the player should have been aware.

"Errr boss, you can't put me on, i'm banned don't forget"

Someone, somewhere, will currently be being taken out and shot!!

As for Celtic, rules or no rules, i'd be embarrassed to progress after a 6-1 agrregate defeat.
Click to expand...

Apparently the player in question did sit out both legs of the previous round and the first leg against Celtic. So as far as virtually everyone concerned knew, he'd served his ban. Unfortunately for some reason he wasn't registered at the start of the competition so Uefa are saying he hasn't served his ban yet, even though in effect he has.

Rules are rules, but that is one hell of an administrative cock-up.
 
Irishshako said:
We had to play a deciding match at the Nou Camp ? Why aren't Celtic having to play one.
Click to expand...

We were awarded the second-leg 3-0, so our tie finished 3-3 with no away goals. Replay was the only option.

Celtic were awarded the second leg 3-0, making it 4-4 on agg, Celtic win on away goals.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back