Those were questions Apology? I'm still waiting on you apologising for making false claims about me and cancer.
Thanks for leaving Follow, Follow long enough to grace us with your presence. Any more pictures of Celtic fans? That seems to be your speciality.
I did say that some of the 11 fans arrested may have been Mariners fans and as we only have a photo of two fans then you have not shown that all 11 were Celtic fans have you? That is not a question. You want me to apologise for you wishing that I had cancer on another thread, yeah that's gonna happen.
That's not what I'm referring to as you well know. You accused me of posting tags about you and cancer and I proved to you that I hadn't. Still, if you're not man enough to admit you were wrong and apologise then all you're doing is confirming what we all think of you as being nothing more than a coward and a little boy.
I hate to seem pedantic (well, I'm not too bothered - better than being a selective pedant) but even though you know that's not the question he asked, the prose quoted in bold isn't a statement - it's inflective, invites a selective response and has a question mark at the end of it - making it a question. You may have interpreted it as rhetoric but, somehow, given that every word you utter is selective rhetoric, I suspect that you recognise rhetoric when you see it having spent all your days honing this craft.
Yeah you say about wishing I had cancer then up pops the tag Medros chemo hell etc. As you are one of the few who has contributed to both articles and you find that topic quite amusing then yes I will assume it was you. Little boys hide behind their computer coming off with horrible comments about wishing people had terminal illnesses.
And I PROVED to you it wasn't me. You can only post two tags. I told you I would post two tags and what they would be and the cancer one was still there so it couldn't have been me. But please feel free to ignore this FACT and make up some other bullshit. You are entertaining in a kind of weird kid with autism sort of way.
I'm not even going to bother, it's perfectly obvious that medro is avoiding the issue and accusing people of saying things they did not, how can you have a sensible debate with someone who is an obvous liar?
Well I did not know about the tag rule, it sure has hell doesn't excuse you for wishing I had cancer in the 1st place. Dev, I have quoted yourself, saying I did say that some of the 11 fans arrested may have been Mariners fans. But you can't seem to find a source to even suggest ONE of those ELEVEN was a mariner fan.
Do you have a source that says all 11 were Celtic fans? (apart from the obvious fabrication in the Scotsman), if this was such a major event why have no other newspapers here or in Austraila reported it? Because 2 people - who may or may not have been Australians - were charged with assault and some drunks ran onto the pitch at half time hardly makes this newsworthy. Maybe you should write to the Record and other newspapers and ask them why they never printed this non story.
Obvious fabrication? Why because you say so. Photographs and a Scotzine article to back up the claims theat trouble was from the Celtic supporters. Like I said, show me where it states that even ONE mariner fan was one of the 11 arrested. Fox News also picked it up http://msn.foxsports.com/foxsoccer/...eny-11-arrested-central-coast-mariners-070211 11 arrests for pitch invading 1 arrest for assault 1 arrest for assualting a police officer 27 ejected at the game 47 turned away from entry
Fox Soccer Australia strangely enough never mentioned how many were Celtic fans? Why's that do you think?
Again, again, again and again. Show me one where it states that even ONE mariner fan was one of the 11 arrested.
I don't have to, it's you who's claiming the 11 arrests and the other sundry miscreants were all Celtic fans. Imagine this is a court of law for a moment. It's you who is doing the accusing, therefore it's up to YOU to prove your case, i'm the defence, therefore I am allowed to pick holes in your case, I don't have to prove anything. So far it's not proven.
I don't have to, or simply you can't? If this was a court case it would be pretty simple. My view backed up with photographs, an internet article and a newspaper article. Against your case....where you say "some of the 11 fans arrested may have been Mariners fans." If you were asked how you came about this conclusion, the best you would be able to do is shrug your shoulders.
You have a photograph, an internet article and a newspaper article that categorically states that all 11 of the people arrested were Celtic fans?
