You got lost way back big man, I said 'controlled but statistically correct' as in Police attack dogs, no they don't count but neither does matey's Labrador attacks that never get reported, it was all ****ing idle bollocks mate. Enjoy your walk mate
Having looked into it in detail, it seems it depends on what the stats are looking for Labradors quite often make the top 5 for # of bites. so are Chihuahua, Jack russels, Chow Chows and german shepards If you look at fatal dog attacks, "pit bulls" are in the top 5, for some reason Chihuahua dont make too many fatal attacks
reminds me of an old (bad) joke what the difference between a Pitbull and a yorkshire terrier ? Would you stop a pitbull from pissing on your leg. it was on xmas card, with a picture. was funnier then, i promise
Must've had to be there My mate's mate once brought 4 (FOUR) pitbulls into the house, they were good as gold, he'd obviously trained them well. He went for a piss and they all started sniffing around the room, I'd never been so intimidated... even when you know they're well trained, I couldn't trust them.
funny thing is, there is no such thing as a pit bull.... it describes a certain personality/character traits and physical appearance but is not limited to a specific breed. the dangerous dogs act is a load of bollocks, as mentioned on here by several people on here already, you can turn any dog into a bad dog if you dont bring it up right. to have certain breeds, its the people who should need to be trained and licensed not the dogs.
I hope sincerely that you find them, fully grown, wild. Remember it is good courtesy when meeting a lion/tiger to tie a dead lamb to your head.
Stupid money, they'd cost a fortune to feed as well, knowing my luck I'd get a picky lion who only likes Waitrose Lobster tail sandwiches and only drinks Bollinger.
WTF Can you imagine the call to the insurance company "Do you have an alarm fitted, Sir?" - "Na, I've got a big **** off Liger, Love"
