Is this not just you over-compensating for your previous attempts at size perspective? Now you're claiming big is little after previously claiming little is big?
I have decided to adopt the Steve McClaren approach to this thread. There is nothing wrong with the way this thread was made. It is not my fault that some of you can't see the pic. I am just unlucky that many of you have **** computers. I am confident that, given time, you will all eventually be able to see the pic and then you will realise that I was on the right track. I have re-edited my original post and re-posted it exactly the same as I did the first time around in the hope that it works this time.
