it wasn't me, but is it actually that unlikely? hardly impossible. ipswich appointing roy keane probably set them back 5 years and perhaps its over the top but i would say appointing peter grant put the club back at least 5 years and i would compare adams ability with him.
It is entirely unlikely Supers. Don't be ridiculous. Financially and institutionally we are streets ahead of where we were 10 years ago. The squad, despite the lack of much to show for it, remains stronger than Worthington's promotion side. So the only thing comparable is league position.
I am as concerned as the next Norwich fan to get promoted this season, but it is truly ridiculous to suggest it's all over, it's been a disaster, etc. Just take a look at Fulham. Sure, 9 points off but despite their absolutely appalling start I think they still have the players to get a play-off spot if all goes well.
Adams is clearly a novice, yes it wasn't the best choice, but it would be even worse to make snap decisions right now. As far as I can tell there is no clear indication as to the extent of Adams' managerial responsibilities, which means I find it difficult to know exactly how much to blame him. As I said on the other thread, as far as I can tell I would rank our problems on the pitch in this order:
(1) Primary problems - communication, organisation and poor concentration
(2) Secondary problems - changes to formation and substitutions
(3) Tertiary problems - injuries
Now the reason I split them up like that is because if you don't have (1), you are unlikely to have (2). Problems under (3) are totally out of our control, but directly impact (1). As far as I can tell, the responsibilities in (1) are with Robson. So frankly, it's the right decision to sack him, or at least someone with similar responsibilities.
The only one of that lot that Adams might be involved with is (2). I'm not even sure I know how much control he has over that. McNally made it clear months ago that a lot of control was being taken out of Adams' hands. But even if he is entirely responsible for (2), and we can all agree that the formations have been a problem recently as have the subs, we also have to bear in mind that (3) has a direct impact on formation and in respect of subs only six weeks ago we were praising [Adams] for his changes which had genuinely brought wins, doing pretty much the same thing.
After all, I think it's relatively well known that substitutions are more or less a roll of the dice anyway.
I'm not sure what to say about "he hasn't got the respect of the players". Over the summer the likes of Turner and Hoolahan signed new contracts. The players were fine when we were playing well.
Don't get me wrong, I'm nervous. Adams needs considerably more, and very experienced, support (a disciplinarian as you say would be a very good start). But disrupting the squad yet further is just the wrong way at this stage. At the very least we should wait a month and get a new manager in at Christmas if needs be.