**calling all gooners**

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
During my short stay on there before I got banned for quoting DB10, I noticed that most of the conversation revolved around not606 anyway.

I was like a breath of fresh air for them, even BADM commented on what 'great debate' I had created. But I guess it was only a matter of time before they baulked at being challenged.

There are only 4-5 people who post on there anyway, I wonder how long it will be before they get bored of talking about not606 and agreeing with each other about **** Arsenal are ?
 
Well... if we are going to discuss them (arsenaltalk.net), we might as well keep it consigned to one particular place and not spread their bad vibes all over the board...
I think some people confuse realism with negativity. I know from past experience that people enjoy worrying more than being positive as they find security in it... like a baby sucking a dummy. As someone said, you can always tell when Arsenal are winning by the lack of posters on there. They have nothing to talk about. And also, there are about 50 moderators and no members.... just a few disgruntled ex members of not606 who stubbornly hold fast to their philosophy of positive-negativity, as if being positive is some kind of disease.
 
zaGooner said:
Well... if we are going to discuss them (arsenaltalk.net), we might as well keep it consigned to one particular place and not spread their bad vibes all over the board...
I think some people confuse realism with negativity. I know from past experience that people enjoy worrying more than being positive as they find security in it... like a baby sucking a dummy. As someone said, you can always tell when Arsenal are winning by the lack of posters on there. They have nothing to talk about. And also, there are about 50 moderators and no members.... just a few disgruntled ex members of not606 who stubbornly hold fast to their philosophy of positive-negativity, as if being positive is some kind of disease.
Click to expand...
I don't give a **** about their board and i don't give a **** what's posted on it.What pisses me off is the making of fake accounts just to disrupt this board.They chose to start their own forum and chose to **** off there.I don't understand why they are always looking at what's going on here
 
goonercymraeg said:
I don't give a **** about their board and i don't give a **** what's posted on it.What pisses me off is the making of fake accounts just to disrupt this board.They chose to start their own forum and chose to **** off there.I don't understand why they are always looking at what's going on here
Click to expand...

Can you ban their IP? Just saying... I guess it would also help to stop talking about it cos it seems to attract them.
 
I just read Ricky Trooper somments pouring his heart out to the Spuds about the nasty mods. How desperate can you get? trying to suck up to the spuds and win their favour because they got rinsed by the Gooners on here.

It's not the first time one of them has poured their bleeding heart out to the Spuds to try and get some sympathy either.

If they don't like it here, then why do they keep pn creating fake accounts and coming back ? Makes you wonder <whistle>
 
Ammaar said:
That isn't what happened at all Piskie, but I'm just wasting my time with you...

Cheers for deleting my post, by the way, Cym.
Not as if you've got anything to cover up, is it?

As for constantly looking at what's on here, as I remember rightly, you'd said to me you couldn't care less if I posted on here. I don't post regularly on here anymore, but seeing as I'm still registered on here and you ''couldn't give a ****'', then I guess I'm entitled to see what happens on here now and again.

<ok>
Click to expand...
How ****ing thick are you ? Have a look at your post and you'll see that i never deleted it <ok>
 
Ammaar said:
Are you really in any position to make comments like this?
Click to expand...

<laugh> I only came back as Cheryl Wiggins because poor old Sensi got chucked out for quoting DB10. Even BADM congratulated me for creating 'great debate'.

BADM even said he thought Cheryl Wiggins was 'Fit' <laugh>
 
Ammaar said:
Piskie - I have no problems with you joining the site as long as you didn't try to stir **** up. And you did. Fair enough there were times where me and you engaged in decent debate and we know you can be a good poster when you want to be - but you also have the tendency to be a twat as well.

For a site that you thought was total ****, why did you post 100 times on it then?

I really do genuinely enjoy Arsenaltalk and I personally have no problems if anyone wants to use both forums - but what I don't like is when certain people start lying, fabricating and misconstruing everything and that's clearly been the case.
Click to expand...
Please enlighten us with what lies have been told and who's been telling them <ok>
 
Poor Cheryl Wiggins has been sitting next to me in tears since that dirty old perv tried to flirt with her <laugh>
 
Ammaar said:
Piskie - I have no problems with you joining the site as long as you didn't try to stir **** up. And you did.
Click to expand...

If you call quoting DB10 'Do you like Arsenal, or just Arsenal with trophies' stirring up ****, then I would have to conclude that the reaction to ban me for it was a tad over sensitive <ok>
 
Gas said:
Shut your noise and show me some love
Click to expand...

Ammaar, if you persist with upsetting us nasty mods and spreading lies about us, then Gas might be forced to post the link to arsenaltalk.net on General Chat.

Then you would have problems with people strirring up **** <whistle>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back