Bye Bye Tiny

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
In threat of drowning in my own bodily fluids after pissing myself laughing.

100% convinced the Taylor rumours are a hoax. Whether the club wants him in the long term or not, no-one else is ready to play 90 minutes tomorrow.
 
Hope we don't sell the leader and only really decent defender in terms of possession (apart from Pudli)
 
Markthehorn said:
Seems like he requested a transfer.

Guess he wanted a longer deal and assurances of starting which Zola couldn't give him.
Click to expand...

It's how it's been spun.

But I'm 100% sure that Taylor was not "forced out", only he was told he won't be first choice any more. There's no other reason why Taylor would leave, certainly not for money as he was on far more than people think is our "wage cap". Obviously he would request to leave if he could go to Wednesday and play first team football.
 
Including loanees we must have signed more players than any other club recently.

It is hard to keep track of who has come in as there have been so many. However, maybe these lads was bought in to replace Taylor, Defenders Jean-Alain Fanchone (23), Neuton Piccoli (22) and Lars (Joel) Ekstrand (23) all on loan with option to buy from (you guessed it)
 
I presume some won't be signed in time to play..

I have to say even if most of the new players are of a better quality (not hard in some cases) surely Zola didn't really want so many players to have in his squad.

Afterall we weren't linked to any of thbese guys in Pre-season whereas we had the 2 Czechs and Abdi in early.
 
So you would rather have us in admin Harrow , why was an administrator and a representative of HMRC involved in the take over talks coz we were in the **** thats why!
We Now still have a club that has not gone the way of luton or pompey that must mean something to you!
 
So you would rather have us in admin Harrow , why was an administrator and a representative of HMRC involved in the take over talks coz we were in the **** thats why!
We Now still have a club that has not gone the way of luton or pompey that must mean something to you!
 
We have been in the crap many times; would Ashcroft have let us go into admin? Who knows? But even if we had, would that have been the end of the world? Loads of clubs have come thru administration. One thing we do know is that bringing in 13...sorry 14....sorry what is it now? loanees is absolutely ridiculous and that we are becoming a bigger laughing stock than even last year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back