If I mocked his stats. Then his stats can’t have been good: but I thought he was a good signing for us before he even kicked a ball.
Who you talking to? This is merely a case of people being made aware that sometimes signings they dont get excited about are great ones. If you don't like it don't read it. I was called a liar, so I've provided evidence and now I'm a troll.. You're petulant. Lighten up ffs you're such a boring **** at times mate
We've moved on I wasn't even talking to you anyway fella. You're sound but I just think you always think unpopular opinion is trolling when it's just unpopular opinion. I think this stems from people taking it personally when I say nufc fans. There's no exclusivity in that, so people think it's directed at them.
You said Willock was a good signing, you were right, well done. Many others were unsure because they hadn't seen him play or whatever. Not sure what you're trying to achieve trying to rub it in, everybody is happy with how he done?
I'm trying to demonstrate to people that whoever we sign it's about whether they can play and if they're better than what we've got. It's banter mate too.... My opinion on bruve isn't a popular one either, but I believe in what I'm saying. Sorry if I bit
A bit like the Joelinton signing. Initially before he kicked a ball I bet a lot of fans where saying wow, he must be class if Mike’s paying that much. Up until recently he couldn’t hit a barn door. He’s played ok lately. But we should still be looking for better and cost means absolutely nothing.
Not quite they were all quite clear in dying he would do well for us. He did better than anyone thought though
I do recall Kenedy being awesome on loan for a few months and us getting another go with him only to realise it was form rather than class. I'm sure I'm in the minority but loan with option to purchase Willock would be perfect - don't see it happening.
