You don t think the US has the technology to fly a plane without steering it? You thick ****, you never seen Knight rider?
So can I just ask, did the pilots fly the planes into the buildings, where they part of the conspiracy? Or where the planes controlled remotely?
I'll ask you too. Where the pilots in on it then? If not when checking their equipment did they not notice something strange about their plane?
Nah the Nutters aboard were patsies, they were conned into it by evil Mossad or CIA rogue agents who had also planted explosives inside 3 of the tallest buildings in new york (and the Pentagon too) which they hit with a missile from their secret arsenal of missiles which can be launched from the ether.
There is just too many coincidental benefits, it defies logic. If people want to completely ignore this then good luck to you. "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" They are actually telling you why 9/11 would benefit them, a year before they made it happen. Too many coincidental benefits that render the event, no longer a coincidence. the 7 billion insurance job, the oil, the regime change, the increased millitary budget, taking care of the missing 2.3 trillion problem, destroying evidence of the enron scandal, taking away rights from the people and giving government more power, the mint that was made on the stock exchanges through insider trading, the weapons and oil companies billion dollar profits, the green light to launch preemptive war in the middle east. too many coincidental benefits that render coincidence an impossibility what the **** did "al qaeda and bin laden" gain? are we that stupid?
The pilots,passengers and the hijackers were all in on the conspiracy.I have a cockpit voice recording of them all singing Gary Glitter's timeless classic 'Do you want to be in my gang' as they crashed into the building FACT.
God knows but its easily possible, easier to crash the planes from the comfort of a control room with a camera than convince rag heads to end their lives... Most hijackers don t crash they land and make demands...ie Algeria in the 80s
what the **** did "al qaeda and bin laden" gain? So the 1993 bomb was also a hoax? If you attack the US you have "nothing to gain!?!"
But if they were to fly them from a control room what about the pilots. Where they killed on board, where they in on it. I'm pretty sure if you want to control a plane remotely you would have to set some device in place rather than just punching a few numbers into a keyboard. But it wasn't a normal hijacking, it was a suicide attack like the Kamikaze of the 1940s
[video=youtube;_kSq663m0G8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8&feature=player_embedded#![/video]
By the way anyone harping on about this every week has something missing in their life, today is the 10 year anniversary and the question was raised.. It doesn t make me or eddie conspiracy nuts.. In my country i have a right to question where my government is sending our troops and why?... Most squaddies don t know why they are there, they are following orders... That is not funny
Considering the average age of a squaddie in Afghanistan is 20 years old and the war there started 10 years ago I think they know fine well why they are there.
