British Politics spam thread

It's quite simple really: if you have a cock and balls, don't use the ladies'.

 

Use a penis to pee - use men’s toilet

Use a vagina to pee - use women’s toilet


Does not include penis pumps or inverted cocks

Pretty ****in simple - Unless you’re ****in simple minded who believes they’re better than everyone else because they’re ’enlightened’
———-

Note :
Not all people who share similiar views are the same but I’m lumping ye all in together ! It’s the GC way …

You ****in Nazi !!!!

 

Humans, yes, but not really the sort you'd want as neighbours. After all, Somali pearls are not a good look.

One day in the future, most likely after you've sired some sprogs, you'll realise how much you and your ilk ****ed up. Of course, it'll be too late by then.

 

Simple one this ...

Born with a fanny? ... you're not a manny ... born with a cock? ... if it's small ... you're a Jock ...
Siegfried Sassoon

 

Sounds about right

It’s ****in cold up here ffs ! Shrinkage

 

Are many of the trans-men entering male boxing competitions or rugby matches?

 

Me and the family go to France on hols quite a bit and the French are much more relaxed on certain things - queues for the Ladies in motorway service stations can often lead to women coming into the Gents, which doesn't bother me one bit ... but you don't get blokes going into the Ladies and with 3 daughters, and the missus, I'd be pretty concerned if any did ...

My girls are 32, 24 and 20 and way more modern thinking than me and their mum - but I suspect they would all be a little uncomfortable at the prospect of a trans woman in a ladies changing room - perhaps less so in the loos - but my missus would be dead against both ... and I think that's the real issue... I'm all for people's rights, but the rights of a minority should never override the rights of the majority...

I don't have a solution - not sure there is one (that saisfies everyone) ... but possibly re-branding loos to:
a) Communal - for use by absolutely anyone, and
b) Women - as now defined

 

Only one changing room needed.

I think that the ones with penises will probably win every event but they will be the only ones shaving their chins in the mornings.

 

People with no understanding of either history or politics always trying to rewrite both...

 

Jesus was probably an Arab. This would make sense as he is allegedly the son of Allah. Clearly you need reversion therapy.

He could be Batman as that is a completely contrived figure whose actions are mostly fictitious, although they were written down in the 20th Century so it is easily proven unlike those fictitious stories passed on by word of mouth centuries ago.

 

But the good news is that Jockshire will stop being the drug death capital of Europe. You just won’t know because English will be a foreign language – most of Govanhill do not speak it anyway. White Jocks are surely not classed as ‘far Right’ because they are not English so it must be their fault for being and voting for the ‘far Left’.

 

Try reading this one posted several pages back: Islam and the left

The Left are Islam’s useful idiots, cancelling the Right until Islam cancels them too.

 

Clearly, like almost everyone else, you never read the 88 page ruling by the Supreme Court (neither did I).

The ruling was that, pursuant to the 2010 Equality Act, a woman is a biological entity of the female sex as defined by science. Cervix, no penis, etc.

There was no reference to the use of gender pronouns so deviants can still refer to themselves as she/her and be mocked accordingly.

In a hostelry that I frequent there is an individual with shoulder length hair and an Adam’s Apple that comes in wearing a frock and a padded bra. It gets treated like it is a woman on a barstool but that is how thick they are around here. What we need is a visit from Crocodile Dundee...

 

Dave Lawrence still totally deluded and being regurgitated by the totally deluded.

Stephen Pollard wrote an Opinion piece – lots of them in the Telegraph – and those that actually read it would find that the headline is derived from Mr Pollard’s contention that Labour are now mimicking the Tories with Right wing policies; therefore, Reform are to their left. This does ignore the hard Left Greens and the comedy Lib Dems led by a clown that wants to get into Downing Street by gimmicks lower than Celebrity Big Brother.

 

Not enough bin bags.

And where are the giant Lego rats?

 

Strange that all the reports of those coming ashore keep comparing the numbers to last year and stating that they are higher. It must be Climate Change – the Channel is easier to cross this year but Ed Miliband is working on it.

 

Thanks but I had already read it: I posted it.

 

Welcome to the “far right”

 

So I will ask you the same question that I’ve asked others…how would you solve it? Ranting daily on an anonymous football forum isn’t going to cut it.
Which ever political party cracks it, will likely have the keys to the government for as many years as they want, so I’m pretty sure behind the scenes efforts are being made.
My own view is this not a political problem…the Tories didn’t crack it, Labour don’t appear to have a solution and Reform will won’t care, as long as Fararge makes a few quid from gullible voters.

 

****ing hell, the irony meter has just exploded.

For over a decade the left have refused to offer any response to their incessant whining of the tories beyond 'not that " and they still offer **** all now.

There have been many, many posts offering a variety of solutions to the migrant issue, the main ones being to stop making it easy for them to get money and housing etc for no input.

Stop all 'payments' and associated benefits like priority housing etc to those with no current visa or approved asylum. Anyone landing from the boats is held in a segregated area until they can be sent back. They will be then ineligible for any legitimate asylum or other leave to remain in the UK for ever. If they damage these holding areas, they have to live with their actions. Repairing them is not a priority.

Tighten the criteria for asylum, so that those granted it that then go back 'home' for a holiday are refused permission to return.

A decent command of the English language and the ability to be self financing would also be key criteria for remaining here.

There's plenty more, most of which has already been mentioned on this thread, but just those few mentioned would cut the numbers pretty much over night and release funding for us to make things easier for those in genuine need of asylum and our support.

Those happy with the current influx have no real concern or empathy with those people in genuine need.