You keep saying this despite me being the one calling for an end to the war and you wanting it to continue. Now here you bring up a mass murder of civilians, that we aren't arming, in fact we are arming their murderers and are saying the heavily armed Ukronazis we have armed deserve MORE sympathy that these butchered and starving families in an open air prison called Gaza You don't have any humanity, you're just into the next campaign in the guardian, as long as its safe, as long as all the important people are on side, you'll back it. Palestine must be ignored incase you're called an anti semite I've more respect for the fuds on here who openly mock their deaths than the sleekit manner of both siding the massacre you carry on with They're at least honest
If anything I’m surprised that they’re surprised. It was pretty ****ing obvious what and who they were voting for, and whilst the noncey sexual predator is a compulsive liar, and the results of his actions won’t be what he promised, the actions he’s taken are right on brand, and close to what he promised on the election run in.
Literally none of that makes any sense. You openly mock Ukrainian citizens dying, not soldiers, normal people that live there. I've never mocked any Palestinian deaths. You fap for putin, I've not said anything about Israel or Hamas. The Guardian pish is just stuff you're parrotting off Barrie. You clueless ****. I think you're just desperate for attention. Tragic as ****.
Barrie is right though. You make up claims about what people have said. I haven't mocked the death of a Ukrainian, a Russian, a Palestinian or even a Judeo-Nazi in the IDF. I didn't say you mocked a Palestinian death. The Guardian pish is little more than an allegory explaining your permissable outrage at world events. Yes you've said **** all about Gaza except little bits of Israeli propaganda. But YOU brought it up today, effectively saying: Russia = Bad Israel = Complicated Why? Because its safe It's made you blind to your moral inconsistencies
What the flying **** are you on about? You're incapable of admitting your passion for putin and his army's actions. My views are my own, I don't follow ****. My twatter feed is all over the place. You laugh when russia fires missiles at Ukrainian cities, blame Ukraine for it and lap up all the russian lies without any additional research. Just yesterday you were ready to parrot the recent lies about Kursk. You clueless mong.
You're trying to be something like the opposite of edgy. Don't know the term. Your views are whatever the press print Again youre making things up. I haven't laughed at missles strikes. You on the other hand have laughed at the deaths of Russians. These "lies about Kursk" are from a pro ukranian journalist at the Telegraph
Yea you're completely ****ing clueless, just repeating the same desperate pish Barrie tries to throw at me. How are you 'edgy' Mindoid?
I don't think you understand words. I didn't say I was edgey. I've discovered why you can't understand my posts. You can't ****ing read.
Correct. Reeves was being asked about the January 2025 growth figure coming in at -0.1%. That is nothing to do with Trump. He did not bring in any tariffs affecting Europe or Britain in January. And before the election in July 2024 the Tories had witnessed two periods of moderate growth. The numbers started on a downward trajectory when the worst ever female Chancellor screwed the economy; and there is more to come when her tax rises come into effort in April. Still no sign of that £22bn black hole. Or the fastest growing economy in the G7. Or the £300 off energy bills. Or the tens of thousands of high pay jobs. Sir Keith Stalin will keep playing the “more money in the pocket of working people” card and ignoring the more money than that going out of their pocket as Rachel from Accounts counts the chickens coming home to roost and even gets the numbers wrong on that.
