Chasing foxes on a tractor seems like a stupid waste of red fuel as it has little chance of success. That is why farmers do not do it. Tweedy ****s chase foxes on horses and they tend to be wealthy people that live in big country piles, who might be a better target for more taxes as they probably pay for private health care and won’t be a burden on the failing Communist Health Service that wastes the taxes on thousands of DEI officers rather than nurses and doctors.
Most of the Portsmouth buses are single level ones. So I always go upstairs, if a double one arrives and sit at the front for a lovely view.
If Putin wants to nuke London, can he wait until Starmer, Reeves, Lammy, Miliband and Sadiq Khan are all there. He might struggle as Starmer has spent 16 days on planes since coming to office while MPs have only spent 34 days in Parliament.
One of the best things about living in London, i love a double decker front seat journey. You can even look into people's flats above shops when stopping at traffic lights
All of Britain used to be a 15min cities. Glasgow had shops everywhere, rows of tenements with shope and pubs underneath then, the best tram system in the UK, and an abundance of trains and a subway system, a thriving community spirit, but the Government and a generation of civil servants thought that wasn't good enough and bulldozed the city, built 180 high rises and ripped out a large part of the city centre by building a 4 lane motorway through it, closed a score load of train stations and dismantled the city wide and urban tram system in the name of progress. All the while, sending all our industry abroad to the detriment of the people who actually live here. Voting can fix these things though
I live in the Suffolk countryside & you don't see any fox hunts these days . Pheasant shooting is still popular, I used to go as a child with Labradores & a stick to beat the hedges scaring the game. It's called beating There's more foxes in London getting into bins the scamps
Yes, the US election. Absolutely nothing to do with Reeves pension comments You really don’t have a clue do you And this is my lunchtime view for today
Really. You think that the US election was in October. That is funny because I am sure that even a BBC Fact Check would prove that to be wrong. Gilt yields had surged in the UK before Reeves even sat down on 30th October, so it was absolutely nothing to do with the Orange Man winning in November. American bond yields moved on victory for The Donald, as did the value of the US dollar. The UK inflation statistics have just caused the value of the UK pound sterling to move as the likelihood of big interest rate cuts by the Bank of England have receded as inflation has gone back above the 2 per cent target. Are you sat looking out across the sloping ocean on your copy of Economics for Dummies?
You are absolutely clueless and I’ve wasted enough time on you. I never said it was because he won, the markets were reacting to the uncertainty. https://ifamagazine.com/us-bonds-in-turmoil-whats-really-at-play/
Habitual liar Reeves caught lying again: Rachel Reeves' 'fake claim' over charity 'economist' role And she will obviously ignore the fact that her Big State, massive spending ideology is failing everywhere: Why the sun is setting on the European-style welfarism
