I've tried to tell them for years that they there best way of killing this thread is to either, offer coherent, robust arguments, or to simply ignore me, both of which they are clearly incapable of. They've followed me around from safespace and tried the same tedious comments for over a decade, and I was one of the main topics even when I couldn't post. There are some posters where DMD is their main topic of conversation. It's clearly not that they don't want to talk to me, it's that they don't want me to talk. That's how fascists operate.
Another thing Starmer will allow to go on is Sunaks objection to Netanyahus arrest warrant for war crimes Putin though
At a time we need energy security, Miliband has banned new drilling in the North Sea. The unions, economists and energy companies aren't happy.
https://www.act.nato.int/activities/cognitive-warfare/ NORFOLK, VA – Cognitive Warfare includes activities conducted in synchronization with other Instruments of Power, to affect attitudes and behaviours, by influencing, protecting, or disrupting individual, group, or population level cognition, to gain an advantage over an adversary. Designed to modify perceptions of reality, whole-of-society manipulation has become a new norm, with human cognition shaping to be a critical realm of warfare. Cognitive Warfare focuses on attacking and degrading rationality, which can lead to exploitation of vulnerabilities and systemic weakening.
Twatter account run by hopeless losers, quoting the frequently wrong reporting of the Financial Times, incorrectly identifies Liz Truss as the reason why mortgage rates went up. Is that account run by some friend of Rachel Reeves, who spent two years gaslighting about the “Tory mortgage penalty” when it was in fact entirely the fault of the Bank of England, where she used to be the tea girl? I should just go on Twatter and keep calling Reeves a liar until she sues for defamation and loses.
Absolutely. The modular systems should be used to take up the slack until the larger ones are built, and the network improved. The proposal is liable to suck up time and money in legal battles, for no good end result, especially if they're still intent on pushing EV's, with associated demand on an already struggling grid, and loss of fuel duty to be found from somewhere.
