It's funny watching the hypocritical ****wits get all giddy and demanding that people respond to their snide whataboutery, but never challenge their pet ****wit for not answering reasonable questions.
Well that's cleared that up. David Lammy, the shadow foreign secretary, said he “categorically” does not support a walkout by BA check-in staff, dismissing their call for a 10 per cent pay increase. Calling it “very sad when any union calls its members out”, Mr Lammy also said: “I don’t support strikes,” before adding: “I support the right to strike of course.” https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/ukne...vid=9ea317898b1b46eeafce41116e2bd8aa#comments
You moaning about people using insults and then insulting insults is hypocrisy, see demonstrating hypocrisy is easy, weird how you weren’t able to do it.
Way to go in trying to rephrase and misrepresent someone else yet again, and making such a mess of it you still just look like a snide, attention seeking ****er.
So there was no hypocrisy, dull ignoring that and carrying on claiming it demonstrates he’s snide. Another day another rinsing for Hulls dishcloth.
Oh dear oh dear, you think you've latched on to an issue, and are trying to be Jeremy Paxman, but at least he wasn't just trying to disrupt discussions and mask his inadequacy. . You've failed with this for a decade, which is contributing to your record breaking meltdown. Prove you're not by challenging your fellow ****wit for not responding to questions. Of course you won't, so that clearly demonstrates that you're a hypocrite, as well as a snide, attention seeking ****er.
Could have just said you’re triggered. Can you demonstrate where I was hypocritical or would you like to withdraw that?
It looks like you don't know what 'triggered' actually means. As a starter, it doesn't mean laughing at a hypocritical ****wit for spouting ****e in the hope of attention and boring people ****less in the process. Prove you're not a hypocrite by challenging your fellow ****wit for not responding to questions. In your own time love.
