I do It's how I learned that although slavery has existed since @Easter Road 1980 wore sandals, the slaves have often been treated very differently depending on culture from outright dehumanisation to holding roles of clerks, bodyguards and even living decorations The transatlantic slave trade was the precursor for white supremacy as most slaves beforehand were either war prisoners and often of the same ethnicity as the slave master (as you say African captured African), while the transatlantic slave trade was down to the colour of the slaves skin. The Americas would not have been built on white slavery as slavery was outlawed within most of the countries that owned the colonies. There's the case of James Knight which is of interesting reading on the matter. Simple dehumanising and ignoring the plight of the transatlantic slaves, making them sub-human in the eyes of white European settlers then freeing them during war and turmoil is why we have massive spastic racists today
This is far too good a post for this thread, please refrain from using knowledge and incite, it leads to mass confusion amongst certain people on here.
You have read some articles with a bias, but it is clear from your rather one eyed words up there, you have many, many gaps in your understanding, or a lot that you'd rather just ignore. Your attempts to then spin your bigotry onto other posters says much more about you than those you're trying to repaint. Not one word of your post contradicts anything in the post you are initially responding to. You are simply trying to reframe the conversation. That shows you know that what I put initially is true.
You may need to look up non sequitur. On that subject and to try to get you on track, here's the post you are trying to shift away from, even though I doubt you actually read it anyway.
Haven't you got some lies to create and posts that show you as a coward and liar to delete ya racist?
I answered the first tweet. You want comment on the 2 ships Britain sent, that were crewed by Liberians, who spent 52 years patrolling the coast of Africa, that absolves Britain of the slave trade? I'd say it wasn't a war, i'd say it was customs and excise.
Your claim that there were only two ships in the fleet is bollocks. You're mixing it up with the blockade. The rest of your waffle didn't cover the rest in any meaningful way. As I said earlier, you may have read some articles, but you are selective with what you retain. Your replies clearly show that to be true.
Given you've stalked over here after your failure to entice us to safespace, feel free to add your knowledge of the topic. You seem to admit to knowing **** all about anything, but use a lot of words to say nothing. It just makes you look jealous and insecure.
Literally the response on the abolishing was to send 2 ships, it grew to 5 ships years later before peaking at 25 in its 52 year "war". The outcome was a 6% drop in slave trade Again I believe "war" to be a joke term for it
