Can you Google for any vulnerable asylum seekers that got killed or even assaulted by English people ? There may have been an incident of man bites dog but I'm unaware. The bodycount is very much stacked on the side of innocent whitey getting stabbed by vulnerable Muslim refugee that just wants a better life then goes all Jihad
Trevor Maiden? Matthew Edgerton? Nicholas Ryan? Don't sound immigranty, but I've never been to Ipswich
The Novotel has 101 rooms & 3 of the Muslim asylum seeker guests have been charged with rape . The population of Ipswich is about 140 ,0000. Yes none muslim asylum seekers commit crime but if 3% of the 140 k were rapists that would be a lot of rape . They are usually branded as "local man " with no fixed address Trevor Maidon was cleared btw not guilty
No it's not. A witch hunt is throwing unfounded accusations around looking to blame people for something.
Fair enough Here is what she said Before delivering the decision, Donoghue read statements from Israeli officials that she said made South Africa's case plausible. She also gave a bleak assessment of the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza. "In the Court's view, the facts and circumstances mentioned above are sufficient to conclude that at least some of the rights claimed by South Africa and for which it is seeking protection are plausible. This is the case with respect to the right of the Palestinians in Gaza to be protected from acts of genocide and related prohibited acts," the court decision said.
If you'd bothered to click the link, she explains what that means too, which is pretty much what I posted, so I have no idea why you wasted your time posting that, unless you were hoping it clouds the fact that the decision was that the Israelis are not committing genocide, and claims they are are simply bullshit. It doesn't change the point about the UN either...in fact you try to avoid that altogether.
I'm sure the former advisor to Obama is rowing back Probably be announced as Weinsteins lawyer in a few weeks too
Still no meaningful response to the points raised. Just irrelevant obfuscation. It's as though you're as fearful as the other lefties of discussing the topics for fear of showing your ignorance. Fear no more, you're managing to show your ignorance well enough anyway.
Discuss what? What she said to the world or how she's protecting her career prospects? "In the Court's view, the facts and circumstances mentioned above are sufficient to conclude that at least some of the rights claimed by South Africa and for which it is seeking protection are plausible. This is the case with respect to the right of the Palestinians in Gaza to be protected from acts of genocide and related prohibited acts," Kind of says it plainly
You're ignoring the words directly from the horses mouth clarifying the UN's misrepresentation of the facts. If your plan is to bore me into submission by posting meaningless ****e, and conforming you're just an ignorant fool, you're right on track.
