1)Before the modern state of Israel there was the British mandate, Not a Palestinian state . 2) Before the British mandate there was the ottoman empire, Not a Palestinian state . 3) Before the ottoman empire there was the Islamic mamluk sultanate of Egypt, Not a Palestinian state . 4)Before the Islamic mamluk sultanate of Egypt there was the ayyubid dynasty, Not a Palestinian state .Godfrey of bouillon conquered it in 1099. 5) Before the ayyubid dynasty there was the christian kingdom of Jerusalem, Not a Palestinian state . 6) Before the christian kingdom of Jerusalem there was the Fatimid caliphate, Not a Palestinian state . 7) Before the Fatimid caliphate there was the byzantine empire, Not a Palestinian state . 8) Before the byzantine empire there was the Roman empire, Not a Palestinian state . 9) Before the Roman empire there was the hasmonean dynasty, Not a Palestinian state . 10)Before the hasmonean dynasty there was the Seleucid empire,Not a Palestinian state . 11) Before the Seleucid empire there was the empire of Alexander the 3rd of Macedon, Not a Palestinian state . 12) Before the empire of Alexander the 3rd of Macedon there was the Persian empire, Not a Palestinian state . 13) Before the Persian empire there was the Babylonian empire, Not a Palestinian state . 14) Before the Babylonian empire there was the kingdoms of Israel and Judea, Not a Palestinian state . 15) Before the kingdoms of Israel and Judea there was the kingdom of Israel, Not a Palestinian state . 16) Before the kingdom of Israel there was the theocracy of the 12 tribes of Israel, Not a Palestinian state . 17) Before the theocracy of the 12 tribes of Israel there was the individual state of Canaan, Not a Palestinian state . In fact in this corner of the earth there was everything but a Palestinian state!
It’s being absolutely flattened and it’s population annihilated, you braindead ****wit spastic ****** ****er.
Am I? Or are you just trying to create a silly narrative that you can then argue against? That post is the cyber equivalent of some dopey **** arguing with a statue. Whatever else they're doing, the Israeli's are not carpet bombing civilians. What you could ask is why the Israeli's are currently doing what they are, and the answer would include Hamas, who are quite likely responsible for more Palestinian deaths than Israel are. I've said from the start of recent events, the situation is complex, and I do not know what the right answer is, but I do know that simplifying it to 'Palestinians good, Israel bad' or vice versa is the wrong answer. I have every sympathy with the Palestinian civilians as they are caught in the middle of a struggle where various factions are using the situation to their own ends. The inflaming of the situation by naive virtue signalers trying to make it all about Palestinian victims, whilst ignoring the fact that Hamas and their associated allies have a stated aim of annihilating all non-muslims and are happy to slaughter their own in the process is putting many more people at serious risk.
Increase your disposable income by avoiding hundreds of millions in inheritance tax and getting a massive payrise for your job of doing **** all. Also wear clothes more than once and you’ll have more money for Deliveroo, lottery tickets and Sky, you silly plebs.
Yeah it’s become a bit of a left v right thing here which is ****. All the free Tommeh simpletons who just hate Muslims more than Jews suddenly big fans of Israel. Hermione and Rupert in their parents’ second home in Clapham waving flags for Palestine. That’s the real battle.
Exactly like the white privileged Upper class Just Stop Oil twats, no ****ing idea in their high vis oil skins
It's funny watching the extreme left on here squirm, and still offering **** all. Here's where just stop oil and other eco warrior clothes are liable to have been made.
I asked a question and you clearly do not have the answer. Or perhaps the meaning of the question mark is not a form of punctuation with which you are familiar (even though you used one). I never made any “economic analysis”. The details that I stated came from the article. When George Osborne chose austerity in 2010 after Labour had left the country skint but with 40 years of PFI debt, I am sure that Gordon Brown would have chosen the alternative option of catastrophic spending. I did also presume that most of the children being referred to by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation were born in the last fifteen years (since Bank of England free money started) as I do not think anyone over 16 is considered a child. Clearly you pray at the Alter of plagiarist Rachel Reeves, who has no policies, never answers policy questions and persistently lies about her economic plans. Her Twatter account will come back to haunt her. Like you, she should start her ‘Economics for Dummies’ training by Googling “MV = PY”. The Left never get it: there is no such thing as free.
