aaaand the next. GB News Star Dan Wootton Unmasked in Cash-for-Sexual Images Catfishing Scandal In the first part of its three-year special investigation, Byline Times reveals the accounts of victims targeted by the powerful TV presenter Dan Evans and Tom Latchem 17 July 2023 Byline Times has extensive evidence to show that, between June 2008 and 2018, Wootton – who is gay – posed as a fictitious showbusiness agent called “Martin Branning” to offer sums of up to £30,000 “tax free” to his targets, many of whom were heterosexual men. The name is a portmanteau of EastEnders characters Martin Fowler and Max Branning. Among them are a very senior executive at Rupert Murdoch’s News UK alongside at least six other staff at The Sun newspaper – one with close links to News UK CEO Rebekah Brooks – friends, Facebook associates and users of the dating apps Grindr and Gaydar. Tonight, a representative for Dan Wootton declined to provide Byline Times with an on-the-record response. It is understood that he strongly denies all allegations of criminality. The representative did not clarify, when asked, whether Wootton also denies being Martin Branning. https://bylinetimes.com/2023/07/17/...in-cash-for-sexual-images-catfishing-scandal/
Really, have you ever heard anyone state that the climate isn't changing (denying it changes)? Everyone knows the climate has changed frequently throughout the Earths life span and will continue to do so. Who are these climate change denier's, name and shame them.
She has standards - she'd NEVER shag Boris and have two abortions to him while he was married when his wife had cancer. Besides which, it's none of your business - it's private if it involves the PM or Dan Wooton, but not a well-known liberal broadcaster (is he?) like Huw Edwards.
Would this be the ****er that's leveled half the infrastructure in Ukraine? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...fdc5d-4cac-4220-9c44-71515b82910a&ai=12308263
The Big Bang theory had traction because it made several predictions which were subsequently supported by observation (the expanding universe, cosmic microwave background radiation etc.). But already, the James Webb telescope is making discoveries which appear to contradict aspects of the theory. But that’s what scientists do; each new generation proves the previous generation wrong in some way. It’s just the pace of that process which is accelerating; it took 300 years for Einstein to show that Newton misunderstood gravity - it took just over 30 for John Bell to show that Einstein misunderstood sub-atomic particles. Newton and Einstein might both have been wrong about fundamental underlying principles in nature, but their equations still work, within particular limitations of scale. The laws of physics offer approximate descriptions of the way that nature behaves, but they don’t reveal to us the true nature of reality; only philosophy can do that, except it can’t because philosophers never agree on anything. So yeah, we know **** all basically.
