Brewster? Not nearly played enough or seen enough to come anywhere close to Origi.
Brewster off
- Thread starter Sucky
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Brewster? Not nearly played enough or seen enough to come anywhere close to Origi.
Klopp must want the funds. Or Brewster has failed to impress him pre season, could be a hidden medical thing
[HASHTAG]#showusthemoment[/HASHTAG]Like I said he had his moment.
The moment was 1 season. Think I'm covering myself there.
Not sure you can claim that. Potentially better, yes. But not actually better since Brewster is yet to do anything in the game
It was a wild and extravagant claim based on pure instinct and a little knowledge. Origi being a bit **** at times also factored in.
TBF, saying someone is better than Origi isn't exactly setting the bar high...
- May 22, 2011
- 73,737
- 25,667
- 113
Love Brewster, I hope he is not leaving.
But if he does, it can only mean one thing.
Mbappe 2021........woooooohoooooooo
But if he does, it can only mean one thing.
Mbappe 2021........woooooohoooooooo
Brewster is definitely a talent but the problem is that he doesn’t suit our style of play. He’s a natural number 9 and we don’t play that.
It would be selfish of us to keep a player on the books when we have no plans to use him.
I much prefer us selling players like Brewster if it means we can strengthen the squad with players who can play now (Jota).
It would be selfish of us to keep a player on the books when we have no plans to use him.
I much prefer us selling players like Brewster if it means we can strengthen the squad with players who can play now (Jota).
This is my take on the situation as well .
We just don't play with a out & out CF and that is the only role Brewster can play so he is surplus to requirements .
Some will argue it doesn't hurt to have a plan B; **** that, make plan A so good that you don't need alternative methods
Our plan A (only plan, if we're honest) works so well so often that a plan B would die of boredom waiting to be used. On the rare occasions plan A fails to produce we get the usual criticism for a lack of alternatives. This always going to happen, but we often see managers who tinker too much come unstuck.Some will argue it doesn't hurt to have a plan B; **** that, make plan A so good that you don't need alternative methods
There are some obvious general changes necessary to deal with particular threats, mostly in midfield - but in terms of our own creativity too much flexibility can be counter-productive. Plan A works the vast majority of the time, and keeping the right players for a rarely used plan B is probably impractical.
