BR charged

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Suarez, who has previous been banned for eight games after biting Ivanovic, will be pissed of to hear that he is about to be ****ed over following Rodgers comments.
 
Sisu said:
So has Suarez treatment of late the refs payback for BR's comments?
Click to expand...

not really as he has been stamped on and **** knows what else players have got away with before this happened.
 
Think at this point we need to get on with it. BR should take the one match ban, the fine, and be back as soon as possible. We've lodged our complaints and if the referee's haven't taken it to heart, anything further will do us no good. We've already lost twice in matches that had some horrible calls (not the reason we lost) and those points aren't coming back. It won't help our reputation to be known as whining twats. His comments are now public record and will be repeated by the media anyway.

He should stand by what he said but unless he's got something to add we should simply shut up and quit while everyone agrees with us.
 
What's he been charged with? Nicking Rylans teeth?
 
Sisu said:
So has Suarez treatment of late the refs payback for BR's comments?
Click to expand...

Surely not <whistle> Was i the only one disgusted with the off the ball treatment Suarez got from Kompany in particular? He got blocked, pushed,kicked. On the move from which Countinho should have scored, as he lays the ball off to Sterling he's scythed down by Kompany.

Terry assaulted him in the penalty area at Chelsea, and again he got kicked from pillar to post. Any other player in the league wouldn't have to endure the level of physical challenges Luis has had too recently
 
I'd contest it, they claim he questioned the Ref's integrity - I'd say he actually questioned the ref's bosses for allocating the ref from the same area as the opponents and the Premier League for allowing them to...**** em!
 
don't understand why all prem managers cant turn round and say what we all know, sorry fa the refs are ****e, you ****s are quick to punish us when we get bad decisions against us and speak out but it doesn't cost you lot points, revenue or jobs, refs don't even get any comeuppance or have to justify themselves.

club owners can pay the fines, only problem, will the fa ban all managers from the touchline.

its all bollocks to be honest, they know and we know they are ****e but prem managers only moan when they are on the wrong end of it, why not all stick together and say sorry the refs and fa are **** we want new ones, problem sorted <ok>
 
jenners04 said:
don't understand why all prem managers cant turn round and say what we all know, sorry fa the refs are ****e, you ****s are quick to punish us when we get bad decisions against us and speak out but it doesn't cost you lot points, revenue or jobs, refs don't even get any comeuppance or have to justify themselves.

club owners can pay the fines, only problem, will the fa ban all managers from the touchline.

its all bollocks to be honest, they know and we know they are ****e but prem managers only moan when they are on the wrong end of it, why not all stick together and say sorry the refs and fa are **** we want new ones, problem sorted <ok>
Click to expand...

Decisions certainly went against you but refs are not all **** and in many cases players should look at themselves before whining about how **** they think refs are. We know the FA are not the most competent organisation of course.
 
Gerrinho said:
I'd contest it, they claim he questioned the Ref's integrity - I'd say he actually questioned the ref's bosses for allocating the ref from the same area as the opponents and the Premier League for allowing them to...**** em!
Click to expand...


This, because bias can be in play without you even knowing you are being biased. in a 50 50 decision where you have to pick one or the other with nothing to separate them bias almost certainly kicks in even if unintended.

There is nothing about referee training that says they can be aware of and prevent such things and also, in the same context of lack of any psychological qualification these refs also like and dislike players and that absolutely has an effect, predisposition plays a part as can clearly be seen with decisions and I think the refs are even more inclined to let teams kick us about after Rodgers had the stones to question an appointment of a ref. He did say the ref was awful so that won't do us any favours with the ref's buddies. That lot are a closed group and if you slate one of them you are likely to feel a backlash tbh. There is nothing that guarantees the integrity of refs. I also think some refs are instructed to do things outside of the rules on a regular basis just like with any other walk of live, businesses politics ect. It happens I have no doubt.

Certain decisions spring to mind that calls into question the integrity imo.
Clattenberg and his shenanigans. The off the field shenanigans, they should have ensured the end of his career because he obviously is not a person with integrity, threatening people and their families. Being in substantial debt also should weaken a ref's position given the stakes and how much a person can make working for a betting syndicate and it is almost impossible to prove too unless you were a complete fool. We will never know because the situation is in no way transparent.
The second was Rob Styles the company he is on the board of earns a nice few quid from RA, Styles gets the next Liverpool Chelsea away game and gives such a ridiculous penalty to Chelsea when they were 1 down. Coincidence my behind.

The major problem and weakness is that the police police the police. :D
 
The Football Association said: "It is alleged the comments by Rodgers called into question the integrity of the match referee, and/or implied that the match referee was motivated by bias; and/or brought the game into disrepute; and/or amounted to a failure to act in the best interests of the game."
Click to expand...

So pick which one/s you think he did then you ****s otherwise how can he respond?

#corruptasfuck
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back