''500 years ago you were burnt if you weren't Catholic in this country,'' Really? Care to enlighten us further?
If I need to clarify to you that gay couples cannot give birth to children, I think you need to go back to school for a biology lesson Of course I meant adopt you wally!!
You never heard of the English reformation? After Englands excommunication from the Catholic church, the creation of the church of England, Mary's swing back to catholicism and mass murders she ordered carried out against Protestants?
This is what you said ''these days gay people are allowed to marry, have children,...'' gay people have always given birth to children, being gay doesn't prevent you from getting pregnant. You just messed up completely on your wording and I picked up on it It's pretty obvious two men or two women can't produce a baby, but a gay person can give birth.
This is not uncommon at all. I know many people whose parents hold views which would be considered as racist. " I wouldn't be friends with this individual as she is .... And therefore ....I wouldn't mind my son marrying a girl of this race but a girl of that race or religion no way." Yet the children do not hold these views at all. Racism is taught and part of the environment and era people grow up in. Younger people nowadays are definitely less racist than the older generation., everything else being equal.
Again with the sloppy wording, 'if you weren't Catholic you were burnt' - that's incorrect unless all non-Catholics were wiped out - and they weren't.
Look Bamber Gascoigne the point still stands, I'm a ****ing Roman catholic you numpty and religious bigotry/hate comes under the same laws on racism in the UK. But who said Catholics were a race?, only you Bamber. Now unless you've actually got proof that Catholics can beat the system your facts are only a side order to the main menu. PS, it was bod that said 500 years, I only quoted him.
It therefore blows apart his view that racism is driven by parental influence It isn't. Parental influence is merely one piece in the jigsaw, and is not the deciding factor in the end view of the child concerned. The attitude that it is the deciding factor merely exposes the compete delusion of the author. He patently thinks his off springs world is concentric around his ring piece.
Records show Mary burned 284 Protestant heretics, Henry VIII range from 57,000 to the 72,000. The troops of his son Edward VI massacred more than 5,500 Cornish Catholics in the wake of the Prayer Book Rebellion. Which one is the mass murderer?
I am impressed with the unequivocal condemnation of these idiots (even though they purport to be their fans) and the apology they expressed. They did not offer any excuses. Mourinho said he was ashamed that these idiots/thugs had attached themselves to his club. If clubs disowned these idiots immediately they will be less likely to commit these acts again.
So back to your original point, 500 years ago you were burnt/executed/murdered if you weren't Catholic or if you were Catholic.
