Heard a couple of interesting bits of information at Christmas folks.
First is on how the Chelsea academy operates - apparently they keep a tally on exactly how much is spent on each academy member under 18, and the success of the academy at that level is based on the profit made on expenditure on each player, and the head the academy is judged on such, not on performance or anything else less intangible. Interesting to hear from anyone involved in our or any other academy setups on if that is the norm or something Chelsea alone do.
Second titbit is that several City academy players over the last few years have had failed drug tests absolved by having an expert match the illegal genuinely failed tests to certain herbal teas/remedies that are allowed, in order to explain the discrepancies. Specifically, the failed test results were taken to certain people and then analysed to see which 'legal' substances could potentially match up, the assumption being at the time that the players really had taken illegal substances and that the 'explanation' would be needed to absolve them as the testers' complaints were entirely valid. I would hate to think this practice was in any way widespread, especially as these are young kids we're talking about.
First is on how the Chelsea academy operates - apparently they keep a tally on exactly how much is spent on each academy member under 18, and the success of the academy at that level is based on the profit made on expenditure on each player, and the head the academy is judged on such, not on performance or anything else less intangible. Interesting to hear from anyone involved in our or any other academy setups on if that is the norm or something Chelsea alone do.
Second titbit is that several City academy players over the last few years have had failed drug tests absolved by having an expert match the illegal genuinely failed tests to certain herbal teas/remedies that are allowed, in order to explain the discrepancies. Specifically, the failed test results were taken to certain people and then analysed to see which 'legal' substances could potentially match up, the assumption being at the time that the players really had taken illegal substances and that the 'explanation' would be needed to absolve them as the testers' complaints were entirely valid. I would hate to think this practice was in any way widespread, especially as these are young kids we're talking about.
. Same 4 teams apart from Dublin who had Pool instead of City. Everyone is just guessing. Everyone had Chelsea top 3. Experts my arse.