I'm 3 weeks post Covid and went to the gym today , I had a coughing fit 20 mins into the session and had to leave and another 10 mins recovering in my car before I could drive ,this ****er is not going away
For anyone that doesn't want to go to Sky: Looks rather suspicious, but they did go on to win 1-0, so who knows?
An integral part of my bet on France v Belgium at the W Euros was Marie-Antoinette Katoto scoring/assisting/shots on target. She was subbed off after 17 minutes Bastille Day, Marie-Antoinette - should have spotted the clues
No mention of it on the campaign trail, so it's clearly over But enough about the war in Ukraine, what about Covid...?
My legal representatives have advised me to point out that is not what I meant. Even if it were true.
Been thinking about doing counter-attack stats for the "Squad watch" article (assuming Sky Sports show enough of the build-up play for such goals in their game highlight vid clips ) . Some of the motivation is also driven by bad losers like Pep the false messiah, and klipperty Klopp, who attempt to use "counter-attacking" as a derogatory term for opponents. So it comes down to an objective definition of what a "counter-attack" is. My first cursory attempt goes thus : X scores a counter-attacking goal against Y, when X takes possession of the ball from Y : 1. in open play 2. within the first 1 / N of the pitch area (as measured from the X goal line) and goes on to score. The definition is parametric (the value of N) . The question that then immediately comes is : what should the value of N be ?? 3 ?? 4 ?? I contend that N = 2 (starting at the halfway line) does not feel like a real counter-attack to me. Anyway, would be interested in peoples' opinions on this.
That is my opinion too, but always better to have a large pool of opinion for what N should be. Who knows, perhaps using our collection of the stats Conte will do a Benitez on Pep and Klopp but inducing the response Fergie got from Keegan.
