Who would dispute that Charlton were trying to win? Only Bexley would count that has a huge positive - as opposed to what? Playing for a point - at home - against Mansfield. And if Jones could not have done any more today, then logically he is either a p*ss-poor manager, or we have a team of p*ss-poor players. Or both. I think this is faint praise by BB's standards. As close as he'll ever come to admitting that Charlton have sunk to a new low.
He’s emigrated to Spain and posts on three different Charlton platforms under three different IDs - admits it one minute, denies it the next. His trademark bad spelling and appalling grammar always give him away. Never goes to a game, but revels in winding up fans who do. A really strange bloke.
I reckon “Sussex” is BB/ Ronnie Moore / Spanish Addick. A near identical lack of spelling, grammar & intelligence. It can’t be a coincidence.
please log in to view this image ElfsborgAddick 10:39PM edited 10:41PM RonnieMoore said: » show previous quotes No its not they want an improvement on last season as the first step in the process.… top 10 would be an improvement.…… You know my comment is correct...One place above our finish last season would be an improvement..,., What process is this?....,.,. **** He replied to one of my posts, so he got this
It should be a criminal offence to be as thick as BB. Most of our starters are old sweats, they are unlikely to be around in 12 months time, let alone see through a mythical five year process. The fact that 7 of the 8 players who are surplus to requirements are Scott / Jones signings says all you need to know about what the “process is” - it’s buy cheap, go cheap, hope 1 in 8 of them comes off. As Sams might say, what’s not to likey about that ,,,,,,,,
BB’s best one was claiming that Methven was trying to rebuild after 10 years of bad ownership. Ronnie is the only person on Earth who had praised & defended our owners during those ten years.
That’s true. To be fair to BB, he’s the Missing Link. He can’t help himself. Whereas Global is anyone’s for a prawn.