Beefy's Corner - The Off-Topic Chat Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
You can't really judge a score until both sides have batted and nothing over 200 is embarrassing but so many of the wickets have fallen because of poor shots it's probably fair to say England are under par.

Is Jimmy done?
 
Puck said:
You can't really judge a score until both sides have batted and nothing over 200 is embarrassing but so many of the wickets have fallen because of poor shots it's probably fair to say England are under par.

Is Jimmy done?
Click to expand...

Under par or typically arrogant .........
 
Typical Finn. Bowl a rubbish first couple of balls, then take wickets. A hat trick wouldn't shock me.
 
Australia's batting lineup is so poor, clarke is the only player who really worries me (and he's out).
 
I'd forgotten how poor the Australian batting is. So far this Test is quite similar to 2005. We better keep Jimmy's path clear of stray cricket balls before the second match.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back