Beadling

[Brian Storm]

It's mad we've got a Grayson fan slating Coleman's signings when Players like Steele, Macca, McGready, Vaughan, Wilson and Ruiter, all 25-30 year old players, all needed to step up and be counted and not one of them has. Coleman clearly had less even less maneuverability. Why haven't these seniors stepped up? They can't for Coleman and couldn't for Grayson. They could have shown O'Shea and Catts right up, they got Grayson sacked instead.

Not that I have anything against Grayson, he couldn't do much with his budget either but he had the better of the 2 budgets and enough to bring a host of experienced players who just went to hiding.

I just think it's bizarre to attack either managers given their conditions but Coleman getting the most **** on tarnsfers from a Grayson fan is laughable given Grayson had by far the worst window.

Far bigger problems than marginal management performance differences. can't understand how every thread descends into this, the board is pap, the team is pap, let's make it more pap by turning every single thread into this.

Hands tried until we get a new owner who'll probably appoint their own man anyway.

 

[clockstander]

4-4-2 would work but it hinges on having a solid pairing in centre mid and centre back where unfortunately our biggest two liabilities play week in week out Mr Cattermole and Mr Oshea.

Right on the button. Sort these two out, and I mean out, and the problems are solved. It's stared us in the face for at least four years, if not five, and only Sam managed to sort it.

 

[The Norton Cat]

[QUOTE="The Little General, post: 11585945, member: 1026687"No his player judgement is questionable. Your's is as bad mind. His tactics are poor. His results are un acceptable regardless. You rate him, its your choice.[/QUOTE]
We don't know if his player judgement is questionable because he hasn't been given free reign over who he can bring in. His hands have been tied. We can only speculate on what would happen if that wasn't the case. And how is my player judgement questionable? I've been saying all along that our squad is not up to it and that has been shown to be the case so far. No, tactically, Coleman doesn't appear to be great, I agree with you on that. I don't rate him, but neither do I think he's awful- I just recognise that he has been given a very difficult job to do and he's having a go at it.

 

[The Little General]

[QUOTE="The Little General, post: 11585945, member: 1026687"No his player judgement is questionable. Your's is as bad mind. His tactics are poor. His results are un acceptable regardless. You rate him, its your choice.

We don't know if his player judgement is questionable because he hasn't been given free reign over who he can bring in. His hands have been tied. We can only speculate on what would happen if that wasn't the case. And how is my player judgement questionable? I've been saying all along that our squad is not up to it and that has been shown to be the case so far. No, tactically, Coleman doesn't appear to be great, I agree with you on that. I don't rate him, but neither do I think he's awful- I just recognise that he has been given a very difficult job to do and he's having a go at it.[/QUOTE]
Norton, I'm only being hard on him because like you all I care and it p isses me off the 3 at the back he insists on. Different if you have a Bale in the team. I'm sure dealt a better hand he may do better, but these are the cards he has. Apologies for any offence.

 

[The Little General]

Oh so you have them and you know players who were available that we didn’t sign? Christ you’re full of it. You’ve been asked that question on multiple threads and still not provided an answer other than “Coleman should know better players”

You seem to know all about the restrictions that he’s working under, how much money he had available and which players were available at the price and willing to come, but you won’t share them? You sound like a Big Chris from the old 606 and he was full of **** too

Coleman is employed to buy players who improve the team, I'm not, and you certainly don't know who was and wasn't available so why hide behind it. I don't know who's available as much as you . You TALK S HITe saying he got the best there was . All I have said was he signed s hite. Two good ones would have been better than 6 crap ones. You're blind Marcus. Lets revisit Coleman in 4 games.

 

[The Norton Cat]

We don't know if his player judgement is questionable because he hasn't been given free reign over who he can bring in. His hands have been tied. We can only speculate on what would happen if that wasn't the case. And how is my player judgement questionable? I've been saying all along that our squad is not up to it and that has been shown to be the case so far. No, tactically, Coleman doesn't appear to be great, I agree with you on that. I don't rate him, but neither do I think he's awful- I just recognise that he has been given a very difficult job to do and he's having a go at it.

Norton, I'm only being hard on him because like you all I care and it p isses me off the 3 at the back he insists on. Different if you have a Bale in the team. I'm sure dealt a better hand he may do better, but these are the cards he has. Apologies for any offence.[/QUOTE]
No offence taken mate and none intended on my part. I don't come on here and expect to agree with everyone all time, but that's half the fun isn't it?

 

[The Little General]

It's mad we've got a Grayson fan slating Coleman's signings when Players like Steele, Macca, McGready, Vaughan, Wilson and Ruiter, all 25-30 year old players, all needed to step up and be counted and not one of them has. Coleman clearly had less even less maneuverability. Why haven't these seniors stepped up? They can't for Coleman and couldn't for Grayson. They could have shown O'Shea and Catts right up, they got Grayson sacked instead.

Not that I have anything against Grayson, he couldn't do much with his budget either but he had the better of the 2 budgets and enough to bring a host of experienced players who just went to hiding.

I just think it's bizarre to attack either managers given their conditions but Coleman getting the most **** on tarnsfers from a Grayson fan is laughable given Grayson had by far the worst window.

Far bigger problems than marginal management performance differences. can't understand how every thread descends into this, the board is pap, the team is pap, let's make it more pap by turning every single thread into this.

Hands tried until we get a new owner who'll probably appoint their own man anyway.

Again you talk pap and leave Grabben out who most likely would have stayed giving his relationship with Grayson, also look at McGeadys goals assists under Grayson. Fake news Darlo boy

 

[Brian Storm]

Again you talk pap and leave Grabben out who most likely would have stayed giving his relationship with Grayson, also look at McGeadys goals assists under Grayson. Fake news Darlo boy

Grabben had no loyalty to Grayson, the ****e just rolls of your tongue when you're on one, making up fictional relationships the lot.

What good are goals and assists when we were leaking goals from fullback but McGeady couldn't be arsed to get involved. He's a lazy ****ing **** and not fit to wear the the shirt. All Grayson's boys have gone missing Aycliffe lass. Admit it.