1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

BBC Formula 1's greatest drivers Number 10: Fernando Alonso

Discussion in 'Formula 1' started by El_Bando, Jul 25, 2012.

  1. u408379965

    u408379965 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    9,988
    Likes Received:
    306
    What's the justification for including Schumacher but not other active drivers? If Schumacher wins an eighth title next season at the age of 45 (I think) it surely changes how he stacks up against other drivers. Unless you think he's already the single greatest of all time?
     
    #41
  2. SgtBhaji

    SgtBhaji Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    14,830
    Likes Received:
    5,944
    He is statistically.
     
    #42
  3. El_Bando

    El_Bando Can't remember, where was I?
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    14,374
    Likes Received:
    1,830
    Mr Schumacher would of been #1..... But then he came back ;););)<diva>
     
    #43
  4. di Fredsta!

    di Fredsta! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,366
    Likes Received:
    89
    But statistics is nothing.

    Are you saying that Karthikeyan is as good as Kubica? Or Piquet is as good as Senna? ;)
     
    #44
  5. EternalMSC

    EternalMSC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    747
    Not impossible.

    But people will still worm out some excuses about how he achieved it if he did.
     
    #45
  6. SgtBhaji

    SgtBhaji Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    14,830
    Likes Received:
    5,944
    No... I said he is statistically.

    :)
     
    #46
  7. EternalMSC

    EternalMSC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    747
    In house complications with the deniers.
     
    #47
  8. di Fredsta!

    di Fredsta! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,366
    Likes Received:
    89
    Statistically Karthikeyan is as good as most of the drivers on the grid as he has the same amount of wins/championships. It doesnt mean he is as good.
     
    #48
  9. 2xwdcslayer

    2xwdcslayer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    37
    Vettel looks good because of the RB6 and 7 , Newey is the Master as he showed at Williams in the 90s.

    Autosports has it right who have Vettel at No 26 even with him being a double champion be cause sensible f1 fans knows he has been driving the best cars for a few years now.

    The Rb7 was a modern marvel.
     
    #49
  10. SgtBhaji

    SgtBhaji Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    14,830
    Likes Received:
    5,944
    But Schumacher is statistically peerless, so nobody compares to him (statistically)... regardless of whether you like the bloke or not. :)
     
    #50

  11. Delete Me

    Delete Me Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    7,361
    Likes Received:
    27

    So where was Newey when the Schumacher/Byrne/Ferrari dominace happend? Or are we going to ignore what happend inbetween 1999 to 2010 when Newey won nothing with regards to the WCC, until Horner, RBR, Vettel and Webber came along? Newey is just one bit of the puzzle to a very strong team.

    Williams and McLaren were already successful teams before he came along so he isn't that big of an impact.
     
    #51
  12. Julius Caesar

    Julius Caesar Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    6,824
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Doesn't mean you can ignore 7 championships. Being on tie 0 is obviously not the correct time to use statistics.
     
    #52
  13. EternalMSC

    EternalMSC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    747
    This.
     
    #53
  14. Paco Montoya

    Paco Montoya Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,672
    Likes Received:
    26
    Depends which stats you use, for example Fangio has a much better win/race ratio
     
    #54
  15. SgtBhaji

    SgtBhaji Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    14,830
    Likes Received:
    5,944
    And a better pole percentage.... was more revering to wins/pole/championship tally. :)
     
    #55
  16. Kyle?

    Kyle? New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    15,002
    Likes Received:
    137
    Just because he made Mansell look like the fat fool he is?
     
    #56
  17. SgtBhaji

    SgtBhaji Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    14,830
    Likes Received:
    5,944

    Because he's a fool... And the Apple didn't fall too far from the tree with Jr. :)
     
    #57
  18. di Fredsta!

    di Fredsta! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,366
    Likes Received:
    89
    I'm not ignoring the statistics, i'm just saying that you cant base judgments purely on stats.
     
    #58
  19. Samurai

    Samurai Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,705
    Likes Received:
    2
    i Think that schumacher is the 3rd best driver ever. senna cums a close second 2 lewis hamilton :)
     
    #59
  20. SgtBhaji

    SgtBhaji Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    14,830
    Likes Received:
    5,944

    Aaaah... I didn't say that was the only thing you can base it on, and I don't disagree. :)
     
    #60

Share This Page