No but it's kinda like one of those situations where you pull a really fit bird and just presume she's gonna be well kinky in the sack...first you wine and dine her at great expense, then parade her around a bit and tell your mates how hot she is...then when you eventually get to screw her she's like a sack of spuds...it's disappointing but you still believe the situation can be salvaged with a bit of work but deep down you know from this point it can go either way...either she shows a willingness to improve and opens herself up to "something a bit different" or in the end you realise her hearts never going to be in it in which case she goes out with the rubbish and you move onto the next one
there is a VERY easy answer here. IT DEPENDS. 1. the two players are entirely different 2. If andy carroll was doing a better job (RIGHT NOW) of hlding nthe ball up and bringing players into the move around him then this debate would not even occur. 3. bellamy is great for fast breask so when we want to counter attack from deep (away from home) then he's the guy
Some people think that Craig Bellamys aggressive beligerant personality may be a bad influence on Andy Carroll. I tend to disagree, I reckon that Andy Carroll has become ''civilised''. He's lost that ''nasty streak''. I believe that Bellamy is just to personality to help him get it back. Carroll has become what I wasn't expecting him to be.....he's turned nice. He's got Drogba's build, he's got Drogba's height, he has to become more like Drogba and less like Emile Heskey.
