The RS knew full well what they were in for. they bought him after he was supended for 7 games for biting. They supported the racist and quite rightly got clobbered by everyone. and Dogleish the buffon lost his job because of that. the racist got off mildly.
In what other instance in football as a player been banned from all competitions from an act committed in one? Its never been done. The only situation where a worldwide football ban applies is when a player commits drug abuse or fails to report for a test. The bite happened playing for Uruguay, the ban should be for Uruguay alone. Suarez wasn't banned from playing for Uruguay whilst serving the previous suspension that were at club level either.
But he did it at a world cup, when the WORLD is watching (ok only 50 people) so he must be kicked hard, and FIFA kicked him. This will teach him and Liverpool from being ******s.
If the colour of the shirt doesn't matter, why wasn't he banned for Uruguay when he committed the same crime in a Ajax and Liverpool shirt...?
I was making reference to your illiteracy in saying 'don't it'. You, being stupid, didn't get it. For the record, you were looking for 'doesn't it'.
WORLD CUP, is the big football event, and FIFA dont want what Louis done, so they have to be seen as doing the right thing, even if it hurts Liverpool, and remember nobody likes the English and hate Liverpool more.
Probably because the fa or dutch fa don't have the authority to implement an international ban. FIFA on the other hand have the authority to do what they damn well like.
The obnoxious little scrote got off lightly. Will be interesting to see what that wonderful orator Rodgers will make of it when asked to make an opinion. Will it be 1. He got what he deserved 2. He got of far too lightly 3. Poor Luis, no one understands the complicity of his genius.this is a sad day for football 4. Bite? What bite? 5. Sell the cheating scumbag Any other alternatives greatly received
That doesn't really help you lot. In appealing he might get to play in the world cup but his ban then extends into the domestic season.
Not saying it would help us, just think they're a bit silly to try. A failed ban could extend both aspects. Won't be happy if its results in the ban being extended either
How on earth can they appeal? Simple answer, double the sentence. Even FIFA's maths could cope with that
You can be absolutely certain he won't give a flying **** what Liverpool fans think. I doubt very much he cares a toss for his Gran, regardless of what Sisu loves to tell us.
Suarez Can't believe it, I initially thought he went for a headbutt, laughed my head off when I saw it was ANOTHER bite! After all those heartfelt messages of how he's turned his behaviour around, personally I think it's ridiculous that he only gets a 4 month ban when it's his third offence, especially as the domestic season only starts in mid-August. I'm sure you tw(a)tfishes haven't even noticed that I've been offline, you b(a)tards! I've changed jobs so can't log on during work, and getting married in 2 days so I'll be otherwise occupied the following week or so! Looking forward to a much improved season under Louis van Gaal, catch you guys later.
The offence,even though it's a third time,was nowhere near the scale of the filthy Keane creature trying to end Haarlands carreer. FIFA responding to a media witch hunt,takes the spotlight off their own lack of morals I presume? Ridiculous punishment which hits Liverpool far more than Uruguay,should just have been an international ban and compulsory councelling to try to eradicate his clear psychological problem.
