1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Article: West Ham v Saints match thread Football Southampton

Discussion in 'Southampton' started by lamby, Oct 15, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 11 of 40
  1. VVD

    VVD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    5,532
    Likes Received:
    2,326
    Is saints player working for anyone else? 405 Not Allowed is all I get when trying to sign in... Don't want to pay all the money for it not to work...
     
    #201
    VVD, Oct 20, 2012
  2. Cowtownred

    Cowtownred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,414
    Likes Received:
    1,064
    Is the Saints player audio working? I am getting nothing just "405 not allowed" wtf
     
    #202
    Cowtownred, Oct 20, 2012
  3. Osvaldorama

    Osvaldorama Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Messages:
    14,799
    Likes Received:
    14,157
    hoooooooooffff
     
    #203
    Osvaldorama, Oct 20, 2012
  4. Downthe36

    Downthe36 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2012
    Messages:
    4,005
    Likes Received:
    86
    Hey! A voice of positivity...your going to be shot! :laugh:
     
    #204
    Downthe36, Oct 20, 2012
  5. Dan

    Dan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    16,211
    Likes Received:
    132
    West Ham look dangerous as Boruc looks rusty again.
     
    #205
    Dan, Oct 20, 2012
  6. Joe!

    Joe! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    18,397
    Likes Received:
    71
    Clyne has had a couple of dodgy moments. Richardson certainly is a lot better at the positioning side of the game.
     
    #206
    Joe!, Oct 20, 2012
  7. Cowtownred

    Cowtownred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,414
    Likes Received:
    1,064
    Me too. I have just tweeted @solentsport. Hope they sort it out.
     
    #207
    Cowtownred, Oct 20, 2012
  8. Dan

    Dan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    16,211
    Likes Received:
    132
    57/43% possession in our favour - we've been moving the ball forward more and are certainly not playing 4-6-0 (unsurprisingly)
     
    #208
    Dan, Oct 20, 2012
  9. Saints Fan4Life

    Saints Fan4Life Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    17,403
    Likes Received:
    10,797
    Just got in and seen our team, bit of a joke if you ask me

    COYR!!
     
    #209
    Saints Fan4Life, Oct 20, 2012
  10. gomarchingin

    gomarchingin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,465
    Likes Received:
    7
    Its the City formation all oevr again , I admit I can not see the game so on that front I am guessing . Possession means little at this stage , they have had more shots than us , what does that mean ? Its still 0-0 .
     
    #210
    gomarchingin, Oct 20, 2012

  11. FdsaJoe

    FdsaJoe Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    20
    Looking pretty good so far, I think Boruc's been okay, his distribution's been pretty clever. On a side note, in my head I've pronouncing his name Bore-ook, but the commentators are pronouncing it Bore-ooch....
     
    #211
    FdsaJoe, Oct 20, 2012
  12. Dan

    Dan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    16,211
    Likes Received:
    132
    We're playing 4-4-2/4-4-1-1 so not 4-6-0 (making you wrong there), and having more possession and moving forward with it means we're not sitting back and humping the ball away hoping for the draw (making you wrong again).
     
    #212
    Dan, Oct 20, 2012
  13. gomarchingin

    gomarchingin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,465
    Likes Received:
    7

    Dont say that , oh ok I'll take the flak from it , all good but please try and please happier <laugh>
     
    #213
    gomarchingin, Oct 20, 2012
  14. VVD

    VVD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    5,532
    Likes Received:
    2,326
    Well if you find a solution let me know!
     
    #214
    VVD, Oct 20, 2012
  15. RickieGoalMachine

    RickieGoalMachine Guest

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    Messages:
    949
    Likes Received:
    3
    4-2-3-1 or you could get away with calling it 4-4-1-1. Certainly not 4-4-2. Rodriguez is an out and out lone striker. I'd definitely call it 4-2-3-1. We have Davis and Schneiderlin sat right back
     
    #215
    RickieGoalMachine, Oct 20, 2012
  16. Dan

    Dan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    16,211
    Likes Received:
    132
    Guly has been up there with him regularly. I'd say 4-4-1-1. The important thing is, it's a long way from 4-6-0.
     
    #216
    Dan, Oct 20, 2012
  17. Joe!

    Joe! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    18,397
    Likes Received:
    71
    4-2-3-1 and 4-4-1-1 are pretty much the same thing.
     
    #217
    Joe!, Oct 20, 2012
  18. Mikey

    Mikey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Messages:
    4,421
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    Oh Puncheon that was so so poor, get your head up son, we had a 5 on 3 if he played a simple ball. Decent start though, fairly comfortable on the ball and better team in the game at the moment. Getting to HT at 0-0 would be lovely.
     
    #218
    Mikey, Oct 20, 2012
  19. VVD

    VVD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    5,532
    Likes Received:
    2,326
    At least we are having a few shots from outside the area, shame none of them have been anywhere near on target!
     
    #219
    VVD, Oct 20, 2012
  20. Osvaldorama

    Osvaldorama Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Messages:
    14,799
    Likes Received:
    14,157
    We need to score really, and make this possession count.

    West Ham will wake up sooner or later
     
    #220
    Osvaldorama, Oct 20, 2012
Page 11 of 40
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page