Off Topic any Mxs out there

Fair enough. If I can be arsed, perhaps I'll send you a link to the same article from a conduit source that you feel more comfortable passing through.

 

You were kind enough to 'like' my response within a nanosecond of me posting it, so I decided I could be arsed.

https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/201...s-ex-wife-tries-to-turn-their-son-into-a-girl

 

Watching PMQs. Kiwi and Soops will doubtless be interested to learn that Caroline Flint has competition for my parliamentary affections in the form of a certain Kirstene Hair.

 

Poor kid in the middle of parents arguing more than anything it seems and the child trying to please each one. One of the big issues here for me is both parents are trying to stick a label on the child! It's a child, possibly a confused child who I very much doubt knows what is going on, well apart from parents arguing. If a kid wants to be a bit 'feminine' meh so what. To be fair we don't know what is going on behind closed doors.

Some of the wording of the article was a touch dramatic, it's not as though we are talking gender reassignment here.

 

If I had a boy who wanted to support Chelsea, I’d chop his bollocks off

 

Well that's more than reasonable

 

He wouldn't go hungry that night either would he

 

Piers Morgan marginally better, Will?

 

The 'Brazilian' becomes a 'Back, Crack and Sack' job. Gender neutral my arse, literally...

Actually, she/he bears a striking resemblence to Emily Thornberry...

 

I thought that was Robert Smith!!

 

I'm sure there's a cure for it...

Ok I'll get me coat...

 

So now we have ‘women’ upset that they can’t have their nutsacks waxed, ‘men’ upset that panty pads are marketed only to women and courts telling fathers that they have no say in the gender identity of their kids. The last one is the worst for me - I can laugh at the absurdity of the first two - because it’s the horrific stuff of nightmares; the state interfering in the family. We’re all going to Hell and it’s pink, fluffy and has a great pair of hairy bollocks.

 

marginally is the correct word another in the past whose shown selective morality. Did you ever see him get absolutely schooled on youth violence?

 

No, help me with that!

 

to be fair Piers didn’t stand a chance

 

seemed a decent exchange and this Akala chap is pretty articulate.

 

That’s because of Akala really, for me it showed how language can be so inflammatory Piers on several occasions put it across as a black issue but Akala concisely countered, whilst I consider Piers generally has a self promoting rhetoric appealing to the lowest common denominator to get as much likes and hatred as possible (all that **** over vegan sausage rolls) he isn’t stupid he could see the way the points were put across if he’d try to argue and or bully he’d have only looked ill educated and bad. Never underestimate how low Morgan will go, remember the phone hacking including the phone of a dead child and the grieving parents.

 

I think you'll like this Will......

 

A nice tonic to his interview with Trump, that was brown nosing taken to another level, truly nauseating.

 

If true, then surely an sane and rational person would conclude that there are only two ‘genders’, but an infinite number of identities, proclivities and tastes? Aren’t we back where we started?

How’s Crewe Alexandria doing these days?