ANOTHER poll from me lol

Should Bruce have been given more time?

  • Total voters
    14
  • Poll closed .
P

Poyet's Eleven

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2011
7,397
99
48
London
It seems like a lot of people speaking today & last night think we were harsh to sack Bruce, most people seemed shocked.

I personally think it had been coming for a while and was justified.

I know there are a few on here who couldn't wait for Bruce to leave, I am interested in seeing how many think we should have kept him for a while longer.
 
Blackcat said:
No offence TVI but surely it is time to accept the decision and for us all now to move on and focus on the next chapter in the clubs history
Click to expand...

None taken mate <ok>

I just found it strange that people thought the decision was rash and all that, saying stuff like he didn't have enough time (5 transfer windows & 2 and a half years <yikes> )
 
Had a year to long in all honesty. Going to the matches and watching the team play, the tactics, the hoofball, the passion, the 2nd half-meltdowns, the substitutions was a hard pill to swallow. No wonder the week in week out lads were fuming. I don't get there a quarter as much now due to a major family health problem but if I was forking out like those lads do on a weekly basis to watch what I have watched the matches I went to, then I would have been screaming get the twat out..
 
The Vaughan Identity said:
None taken mate <ok>

I just found it strange that people thought the decision was rash and all that, saying stuff like he didn't have enough time (5 transfer windows & 2 and a half years <yikes> )
Click to expand...

He had time, he had to much time.....to think it over...


[video=youtube;ttuA1UEUAI0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttuA1UEUAI0[/video]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back