http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/40980955
It seems VT isn't too happy, who could blame him? It appears we can't go through a season without something negative popping up!
Whatever your personal views on VT as a chairman or your perception of him as a man, is he right to pursue this?
My view is he's right to investigate this and satisfy himself, whatever the outcome, that he was either right or wrong in his view of the deal. However, I think it's wrong to put this into the public domain until it is resolved.
Some may view it as a witch hunt against MM, others may differ in their opinion. One has to look at the merits of the case, unfortunately, I don't think we'll ever know the full truth.
I agree with VT that £8 million for a relative unknown is a lot of money. £45,000 per week was a crazy amount to agree to for an unproven striker. There are many questions to be answered on the valuation alone, never mind the weekly pay.
It could be argued the MM was a fledgling manager at the bluebirds who may have got caught up in the moment. Having been given a huge (in relative terms) transfer budget and just promoted to the premier league was he blind to the reality? Most, I think, agree the purchase of Medel and Caulker seemed reasonable at the time, but the cost of Cornelius left a few scratching their heads.
For his part, VT gave MM carte blanche to do what he thought necessary to stay in the premier league. The oversight of transfer dealings appears to have been non-existent with MM seemingly throwing money around in almost Ridsdalesque fashion, maybe they had the same financial advisor...
Both parties have to shoulder the blame as both were naive. MM a relatively new manager getting a war chest with seemingly little knowledge of transfer negotiations, especially premier league. VT with little knowledge of football in general.
Will this affect the performances on the pitch? I think not.
Will this move focus from our awesome start to the season, no way.
Is it an issue we need to be concerned with? No, it should be done away from public scrutiny.
What are your thoughts on this?
It seems VT isn't too happy, who could blame him? It appears we can't go through a season without something negative popping up!
Whatever your personal views on VT as a chairman or your perception of him as a man, is he right to pursue this?
My view is he's right to investigate this and satisfy himself, whatever the outcome, that he was either right or wrong in his view of the deal. However, I think it's wrong to put this into the public domain until it is resolved.
Some may view it as a witch hunt against MM, others may differ in their opinion. One has to look at the merits of the case, unfortunately, I don't think we'll ever know the full truth.
I agree with VT that £8 million for a relative unknown is a lot of money. £45,000 per week was a crazy amount to agree to for an unproven striker. There are many questions to be answered on the valuation alone, never mind the weekly pay.
It could be argued the MM was a fledgling manager at the bluebirds who may have got caught up in the moment. Having been given a huge (in relative terms) transfer budget and just promoted to the premier league was he blind to the reality? Most, I think, agree the purchase of Medel and Caulker seemed reasonable at the time, but the cost of Cornelius left a few scratching their heads.
For his part, VT gave MM carte blanche to do what he thought necessary to stay in the premier league. The oversight of transfer dealings appears to have been non-existent with MM seemingly throwing money around in almost Ridsdalesque fashion, maybe they had the same financial advisor...
Both parties have to shoulder the blame as both were naive. MM a relatively new manager getting a war chest with seemingly little knowledge of transfer negotiations, especially premier league. VT with little knowledge of football in general.
Will this affect the performances on the pitch? I think not.
Will this move focus from our awesome start to the season, no way.
Is it an issue we need to be concerned with? No, it should be done away from public scrutiny.
What are your thoughts on this?
