1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Another Email surfaces

Discussion in 'Celtic' started by Bhoyzilla, Apr 11, 2011.

Page 2 of 2
  1. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    when you are supposed to be impartial.
     
    #21
    RebelBhoy, Apr 12, 2011
  2. Thomas The Cat

    Thomas The Cat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,832
    Likes Received:
    233
    Sorry can you show me where they have not being impartial in this email?

    Look I know the SFA has a few bad eggs, I wouldn't trust Peat to run a bath and Campbell Ogivie is if anything worse but this email does nothing to show any evidence of bias treatment. It makes us as a support look petty and doesn't help in the cause of modernising the SFA to an efficient and productive organisation.
     
    #22
    Thomas The Cat, Apr 12, 2011
  3. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    I didn't say it showed any evidence of bias treatment. I said it showed a lack of impartiality. which it absolutely does.

    “ahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha go on yerself bobo – get it right up them”

    it is certainly not professional is it?
     
    #23
    RebelBhoy, Apr 12, 2011
  4. Thomas The Cat

    Thomas The Cat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,832
    Likes Received:
    233
    No but it wasn't in a professional context. A lack of impartiality would imply bias would it not?
     
    #24
    Thomas The Cat, Apr 12, 2011
  5. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Only if that lack of impartiality were to manifest itself
     
    #25
    RebelBhoy, Apr 12, 2011
  6. DevAdvocate

    DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    63,752
    Likes Received:
    13,027
    Like today's sham at the SFA offices?
     
    #26
    DevAdvocate, Apr 12, 2011
  7. supermong

    supermong Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Under the SFA rules what do you feel would be a more fitting ban?

    I agree that Boogie and Diouf should have had a harsher penalty but the rule book could only have banned them for more Scottish Cup games that they wont play!
     
    #27
    supermong, Apr 12, 2011
  8. Mick

    Mick Probably won't answer PMs
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,325
    Likes Received:
    926
    It honestly seems like the SFA did this to get on our tits. They are pissed off with all the crying we've been doing and wanted to get it up us with this, especially since we got it over them legally only a week ago. It's basically a retaliation in a continuing war.
     
    #28
    Mick, Apr 12, 2011
  9. supermong

    supermong Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mick, thats total ****ing pish....

    What ban would have been more fitting and reasonable?

    Again I think they should have got a harsher punishment BUT what can the SFA do with their archaic rules...
     
    #29
    supermong, Apr 12, 2011
  10. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Evidently they could and should have done something. Paul McBride is not a stupid man and for him to make the comments that he has would indicate strongly that there was other avenues of recourse available to them
     
    #30
    RebelBhoy, Apr 12, 2011

  11. Mick

    Mick Probably won't answer PMs
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,325
    Likes Received:
    926
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/2365589/Celtic-relieved-as-Lennon-is-let-off-lightly.html

    Lennon's behaviour was only slightly worse than Bougherra's, and I mean only slightly. He was angry, he man handled and he got a three match ban in which the referees threatened to strike because it was too light.
     
    #31
    Mick, Apr 12, 2011
  12. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    I wouldn't want to speak for supermong but maybe he meant that because it was a cup game their hands were tied?
     
    #32
    RebelBhoy, Apr 12, 2011
  13. Mick

    Mick Probably won't answer PMs
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,325
    Likes Received:
    926
    from that article "The ban covers all football, starting tonight with Celtic's home CIS Cup tie against Falkirk."
     
    #33
    Mick, Apr 12, 2011
  14. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    fair point.
     
    #34
    RebelBhoy, Apr 12, 2011
  15. Thomas The Cat

    Thomas The Cat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,832
    Likes Received:
    233
    They couldn't ban them Bougerra held down the panels arms so they counldn't pick up the pens.
     
    #35
    Thomas The Cat, Apr 13, 2011
  16. EDGE

    EDGE Guest

    <laugh> <laugh>
     
    #36
    EDGE, Apr 13, 2011
  17. supermong

    supermong Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Cracker <laugh>

    Bet he winked at them afterwards
     
    #37
    supermong, Apr 13, 2011
  18. DevAdvocate

    DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    63,752
    Likes Received:
    13,027
    Nonsense. Would you like to correct yourself?
     
    #38
    DevAdvocate, Apr 13, 2011
Page 2 of 2

Share This Page