Anonymity on this site?

please log in to view this image

 

Do you honestly think that they're talking about a few broken sentences that are irrelevant to anything I've ever said on here?

Or do you maybe think they're talking about analysing ****loads of text written by someone, which could then be used to find patterns/...

<jakey'swikipediafail>

 

??? pm me the meaning , then i'll edit this with a and look cool as ****

 

Not wikipedia, its a research paper. How many word groupings do you think it takes them to start forming a statistical probability match of writer. Again, a sample size of 30 is usually enough to provide a robust sample. Im sure you have achieved at least 30 groupings of general common words on your LinkedIn account that you have used here at some point

 

It's an esoteric joke.

 

No I don't. Not even close. I have the titles of the jobs I've had, the languages I speak, and 2 sentences explaining my current situation.

This data is ****ing pointless, there are no patterns to be detected, and they are generally sentences with broken structure as bulletpoints.

There is no algorithm that could link those 2 profiles together. None. Not one. Even in your wildest dreams. The data it would have to compare/analyse/trawl through is so vast your tiny brain couldn't even begin to understand. Going by language there is no way of linking my posting on here and my LinkedIn account.

Get it?

 

up yours ya fat anorexic , homeless bedsit living pish stained monobrowed taig etc etc

 

Esoteric in the sense I was using it means "****e joke that no-one else will get but will be passed off as somehow clever"

 

So basically what you are admitting is, I have **** all qualifications, I have **** all work experience, I have **** all to put in my LinkedIn account to even constitute a couple of hundred words?

No wonder you earn so little

 

My whole arguement was based on the premise you actually had something to write in your account, sorry Toby I overestimated you. My fault not yours

 

I don't care , i've just fooled google's spies into thinking i'm Ben so get it up ye the whole bottle of linseed am off oot with they chaps

 

It's like a convention of vaginas/gussets on here.

 

So basically you are wrong? But change the ****ing subject

I don't have much on my LinkedIn account because I don't care about it, it's just there because I had no online presence and I'm the only person in this country with my name, so if any current employer/person I know/friend googled me there was only my address that showed up.

I have plenty of experience and qualifications, they're just not data that you can analyse to find patterns, which you then have to compare to all the text on the internet to find if there are any similarities. From a few broken sentences.

Can you see how stupid you are?

Are you going to apologise?

Don't bother answering, it's pretty obvious

 

I take it your profile is sprawling tale of your past careers?

Endless paragraphs vividly detailing the 2 years you spent sucking off Turkish men in phone boxes for bits of kebab.

 

You'll fit right in then.

 

Now now, venom. Business and pleasure dont mix

 

Apologise for mistakenly assuming someone who blows their intelligence trumpet so much might actually have something to write in their LinkedIn. I have many former uni mates with degrees in Computer Science, their accounts are like essays. Your "iv only written down my programming languages" arguement is bull

 

I've got 'subconscious fingerprints' on my cock! My cock is relative! Relativity is subjective and objective. My last wife was objective of my cock and my last wife was an object! does this count???

 

Yes, it counts.

 

Thanks!