And yet Evra changed his evidence three times, lied on oath about his distaste of

Suarez was stiched up good and proper.

Liverpool fans are the only people who can see it because their the only people who actually WANT to see it.

I DARE everyone, especially non-LFC fans to google "Newsframes Suarez Evra" and read the independent analysis they did (and the guy who done it hates football so theres no bias at all) on the inconsistencies and lies presented by the FA and inparticular the Media.

If you can read their investigation and still think Suarez was treated fairly your either a grade A moron or completely tribal and biased therefore being closed minded to a different narrative other than the one presented by the mass media.

 

^This^

 

Hilarious

 

Resort to mockery when you can't actually make a case?
Proves our point really.

 

Then what you are doing on a forum is a complete mystery to me as nearly all the topics raised are rehashed versions of the same topic which is why we like football and the forums in first place. Even topics discussing the future are normally rehashes so unless we have some new rule which states we can only discuss brand new events get used to it.
The old its in the past just move on get over it is way to easy to use. If that is the case do not reply or get involved with those who wish to discuss, rant, argue, be childish or petulant. It is the old mary whitehouse argument if you dont like it do one its quite simple. Some people enjoy a right good wum

 

It wouldnt matter what we said, as Swarbs put it, its like arguing with a creationist.

 

I actually couldn't give the slightest **** saint. If I could be arsed then I would highlight my point vividly thanks, you patronising old twat.

But, you are flogging a dead horse. It's not mockery, it's just trying to inject a bit of humour into a frankly tedious debate.

 

Except a creationist has faith in something for which there is no verifiable evidence whereas you just flatly refuse to look at the evidence presented to you and use sarcasm in lieu of an argument.

 

By evidence I take it you mean your opinion and the opinion of you fellow Liverpool fans, and pretty much that's it?

Otherwise, there is no 'evidence'.

 

The majority of neutrals wouldn't be bothered to read the whole report though- if it wasn't my club I'm sure I wouldn't have taken the trouble. So, all they have to go on is what has been selectively reported through the media which has been grossly inaccurate.

But that isn't the point of this thread is it? The thread is about how the FA apply the rules to suit their own agenda rather than to administer justice objectively, and how they make completely contradictory statements and judgements with apparent impunity.
Everyone in football should be concerned with this, because sooner or later their club is going to be on the receiving end.

 

There's plenty, you just don't want to see it.

 

No, there isn't. There is what you want to see and how you want to interpret it.

If, as you say, there is so much clear and conclusive 'evidence' Suarez either would have been cleared or Liverpool would have appealed.

Obviously.

For what it's worth, I think the FA should have thrown the same book at Terry. That's your only genuinely gripe though.

 

Yes, plenty against Suarez.

 

http://therepublikofmancunia.com/the-suarez-report-broken-down/

Have a read, no bias, no agenda. Talks about Evra changing his story and the inconsistencies in everyone of the Liverpool players/staff who were questioned.

One thing guilty parties do though is to try and discredit a witness, something Dalglish and Comoli did immediately by lying about Evras previous none existent claims of racism.

 

Everyone sing along!

Always the victim

 

read this and make up your own mind one way or the other....