...but that proves that John was spot on
Knight takes Queen (assuming the real Bishop was a Knight)
Off Topic And Now for Something Completely Different
- Thread starter Dr.Stanley O'Google, HCFC
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Knight takes Queen (assuming the real Bishop was a Knight)
Good of you to check mate.
Good opening gambit there, DMD.
Unless she did some castling. Then he would have been a mere pawn in her game.
You can't blame the Rev for not getting himself knighted.
It's not his fault he's not a knight.
Stop bashing the bishop everybody.
Am I the only one seeing this different?
Queen is on a black square, if the Bishop who is also on a black square was a knight it could move 2 forward and 1 sideways or vice versa but either way it will end up on a white square.
It could end up standing next to the Queen in which case the Queen will take the Knight.
I don't know how to break this gently, but it's not really a chess game.
Bollocks
I’d only glanced and saw the bishop’s cassock shadow as being his pointy shoes in the white square
I always have that bloody problem with cassock shadow!
* It might not be a cassock, but it’s the only Bishopy word I could think to call his dress.
You must log in or register to see media