An article worth reading...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
This

"Cheik Tioté's screamer of an equaliser produced one of the most joyous moments of this or any other Premier League season."

Then this ****e


The last 22 minutes never happened The last 22 minutes never happened The last 22 minutes never happened The last 22 minutes never happened The last 22 minutes never happened The last 22 minutes never happened The last 22 minutes never happened The last 22 minutes never happened The last 22 minutes never happened The last 22 minutes never happened

Arsenal won 4-0 Arsenal won 4-0 Arsenal won 4-0 Arsenal won 4-0 Arsenal won 4-0 Arsenal won 4-0 Arsenal won 4-0 Arsenal won 4-0 Arsenal won 4-0 Arsenal won 4-0 Arsenal won 4-0 Arsenal won 4-0 Arsenal won 4-0 Arsenal won 4-0

Whinging Arsenal ****stain
 
I don't read this article so positively, why all the paragraphs bringing out negatives about our support, if you are going to write about the response during the second half then do so, it does not need all the negative opinions and quotes about our Blubbering, delusional and over sentimental support. Sorry but I think this a hatchet job, backhanded compliments at best from a scouse blue nose, you can't trust journo's.
 
It's not bringing out the negatives of our support, it's clearly defining the overused drawl Newcastle Hater's have been spouting for Decade's.
 
Rumsfeld said:
It's not bringing out the negatives of our support, it's clearly defining the overused drawl Newcastle Hater's have been spouting for Decade's.
Click to expand...

My point is why the need for paragraph after paragraph of negative prose when the article is supposed to be about the support displayed in the second half of the match, a couple of sentences maybe to set the picture but it's a kicking piece disguised as praise. The title could have done without the "Villified" and the first 5 paragraphs are all about how bad our supporters are with their deluded, over emotional, sentimental etc support, read it properly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back