I didn’t say that it did but elite sport is about marginal gains. One such gain is the difference gleaned from training daily at an elite facility rather than running round a park.
Ambition
- Thread starter FosseFilberto
- Start date
I didn’t say that it did but elite sport is about marginal gains. One such gain is the difference gleaned from training daily at an elite facility rather than running round a park.
I think you'll find it was more an "E"Fosse what’s an ‘s’ between lovers?
Because they have all realised the improvement which comes from investing millions in training facilities.
If you know anything about fitness and wellbeing then you’ll know that the more advanced facility can help but it can’t improve natural ability.
That’s a given as natural ability is your base level of ability if you didn’t practice at all. My point originally was about you saying that facilities made no difference.
Hmm, George Best, Peter Osgood, Matt LeTisser, Paul Gasgoine Geoff Hurst, Jimmy Greaves Gordon Banks tell you, you’re talking out your arse.
All good or great players, Ginge, and all had lots of natural ability and all would have been better had modern facilities been around in their day.
Bollocks, all those players played as they wanted, untrainable in ability but it’s because they all had natural ability and not what a building or staff cannot put inside.
I see you enjoy headbutting a brick wall?
That doesn't even make sense you pissed up old tramp.
That was my point; pedigree works when it comes to predicting the competitive ability of horses, but is far less significant when applied to humans.
Classy mate.
There goes that mask again
He's had a mare today
But the lads had a good laugh
You must log in or register to see images
... worry not Malvolio ... we'll do both ... and then some
