I'm not picking out individuals, there are bound to be unavoidable injuries in all of those. Just saying he does have a terrible run of injuries ........ at every club he's managed. The Birmingham captain even criticised his methods regarding injuries, but that may be nothing.
Are you suggesting he's responsible for your long list of injuries that's keeping you down with us? Not sure why you'd blame him for ours, he's the manager not the coach. Not that that's the reason for our best players to be out. If this is yet more of your obsessive whining about him, honestly we have nowt to discuss.
I'm not blaming him, do you never read what people say before making your pronouncements? BTW, I didn't ask you to discuss anything ......... just don't. You were asking how many shots we had and I said 'one more than you' .......... end of discussion,
Do you often change subject mid flow? At least we seem to agree, finally, that Brucie didn't cause our huge injury list. What's caused your long list then?
I didn't ........ you constantly 'quote' people on things they haven't actually said. I didn't claim Bruce had caused your massive injury list, but didn't say he hadn't. Don't misquote what I've said, I'll just keep correcting you which is boring. It's just ridiculous but you obviously do it to create a smokescreen for your ludicrous arguments
No one's forcing you to carry on a discussion you claimed was over ...... but you carry on regardless. Just stop.
We were discussing injuries. You made some incorrect insinuations about Brucie, then back tracked, then reverted back to something gone days back. I'm starting to think you use comedy emoticons in every post to mask some of your own failings. This is a discussion forum. If you don't like discussing things, you should consider trying a different forum.
I'm discussing the long injury lists we are both suffering that's keeping us at the bottom of the table. Not sure why you find it so difficult.
Before that... All clubs have injuries, it's just that Bruce's have more than most We seemed to be having a reasonable discussion then you started being arsey, If you don't want a discussion just stop posting. That's how online discussions work. If you just want a mud slinging and name calling session just say so. You seem to want both which is confusing.
I was simply answering your question about how many shots we'd had on target. It was 4 against your 3, surely nothing confusing about that is there? I don't believe I've slung any mud, why would you be getting upset? Perhaps post 152 could be construed as mudslinging .......... who cares? "To the Mackems - How many shots did you have on target? What formation did you play? How come a fully fit Defoe couldn't score? Im not Wumming you, I just think you need more than just a Defoe to win you games, you, similar to us in fact, need a decent midfielder who can actually get the ball to the striker. Being replaced by Graham too...kinell thats gotta hurt."
Kinell. Is there two of you posting at the same time? No mud slinging. Mud slinging in post 152. Two reasonable questions bolded and a third statement that was a quote from some real life mates of mine who are Mackems that I thought funny. True as well. He's dire. I'm not upset btw. I'm bemused.
I'm surprised at how unfit he is tbh, he was struggling to get past the hour mark yesterday. I was surprised Poyet didn't make changes earlier although, I suppose, gaining match fitness requires time on the pitch. (BTW, one of the 'hilarious taggers' can't spell Guinness.)
Aye he's struggled past the hour mark. He'll get there though and Even If not fit he's still getting into dangerous positions in the time he's on the pitch.
