OK explain what the book says and who follows what
Can't wait for that either![]()
Do you follow the version that IS follow?
OK explain what the book says and who follows what
Can't wait for that either![]()
Last week you claimed apostasy is fine and there are tons of queers in Muslim countries , as long as they don't nosh each other off in public it's accepted.
True Muslims go to Mecca and stampede each other to death, the Arabs walk to the front and the raisin heads and Asians line up separately.
I have been to Dubai many times and you should see the look on an Arab's face if he has to serve a Btitish Pakistani in a restaurant.
They think they are dirty .![]()

Oh dear"Ladt" week?
Tons of queers?
Never happened

Do you follow the version that IS follow?
Oh dear![]()
You have made the claim, back it up
What do they follow?
He's got to be an islamophobe trying to make muslims look ridiculous.




Atheist to islamophobe
![]()

Ah, you're down to that wriggle much earlier this time.




The staff at hotels and restaurants in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates that were born locally do not think Asian Muslims are equal to White English people or Arabs from the UAE.Are Arabs "Btitish"
Your memory is weaker than your debating skills, it started with pagan.![]()




Yeah I'm the one wriggling
Do you want me to quote your claim? You know the bit after what I highlighted
The staff at hotels and restaurants in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates that were born locally do not think Asian Muslims are equal to White English people or Arabs from the UAE.
Probably because they don't tip .

Its hard to keep up you keep changing your claims to what I am
![]()
I notice you didn't argue the bit about you making muslims look ridiculous.
It's your own argument I'm offering you.
You claimed that someone saying they were muslim, but not following the book in the way you feel it should be was an atheist.
So, I'm guessing you don't support the literal version that IS follow. By your definition, that makes you an atheist.
I don't think you're an atheist, I'm just pointing out one of the many gaping flaws in the 'logic' you use.
Not in the least, my opinion of you hasn't changed for quite some time.
The claims are not mine, they're yours, arrived at by applying the 'logic' you offered.

OK now I am not atheist? Again
I am a meat eating vegetarian though right?