Quintessential muppet response, put on your arse so you've decided to have a bit of a cry and tuck your dick in between your legs and waddle off into the sun. If you wanna dance pal, make sure you know the ****ing routine or you'll get slapped.
Unlike yourself I choose my words very carefully ....... I can differentiate between two entirely different words and don't need to swap them. I'd need further proof to be 100% sure but, at first glance, I'd say you're an ignoramus and an idiot
If you think I have had my pants pulled down then you are mistaken. You have chosen to ignore my points, like you have chosen to selctivly believe what you like. You are the ignoramus and should try reading. It helps.
Great, I take no insults from a moron who refuses to go to 2/3 of the world because of the ethnicity of the population, you will understand if I do not take your insult to heart. It is you who seems the idiot sir.
I know now if I do not put the final reply then everyone will go "hahahaha you made him look like an idiot". I will not play silly games on here but please be assured. The purpose of my post was to encourage those who are interested to research and not believe the bile that some people spout on here (myself included). Please do your own research, talk to Muslims, talk to people, read, read read. It makes the world a less scary place.
I've noticed that idiots will often use terms like 'sir' when they're trying to fool people into believing they're intelligent or learned ........ fail
Hasn't even noticed he's arguing with two separate people here. You've flopped pal, it could have went so much better for you if you had a quarter-ounce of intellect, but you turned up writing like some 9 year old div kid who's just had his first set of crayons given to him, reeling off cliches and verbatim crap that gets published in every article regarding religion, fighting the good fight for the Muslim corner (Ironically with a fella who has never condemned the entire religion ) and hasn't provided any evidence other than "I've seen" or segregated incidents. The fact is, you don't know a lot at all. You just say you know a lot so that you can get yourself a bit of leverage in your argument... what you do know is irrelevant in here, it's warped and you fail to acknowledge things that are fundamental to this debate. Others on here will tell you to go **** yourself because they have to right to, after the way you stepped in like some spokesperson with an axe to grind, I'd give you all the time in the world, if you'd just be even remotely constructive. Until then, you're just boring and predictable.
Reading the ****e people like you write makes me scared for the future of mankind, you're just the kind of ignorant nutcase who causes trouble.
He's ****ed off Smug, he's probably only gone to do some more reading though so no doubt he'll be back... armed with many a balanced article he's pulled from www.google.isis
This is seriously the best that you two can come up with? I called you sir and you pick up on that. I do know quite a bit, questioning my intellect seems like a childish dig if anything and shows your apparent lack of it. I have never accused you personally of condemning Islam. I have not assumed no-one here has never spoken to a Muslim. It seems some people could benefit judging by the restricted view they have on the world. As for why I make you scared for Mankind because I encourage people to research prior to them posting ignorant piss on here I have no comprehension. Again you will not go to a large proportion of countires because of the ethinicity of its inhabitants. You will not be offended if I do not take your views seriously I am sure. Assuming I get my articles or reaseach from google.isis shows your ignorance more. Not once have I supported the acts of this terrorist group. I can play the petty insult game if you like as you seem more determined to "win" this debate, however a more constructive reply may work better for you, just a suggestion.
It reflects, perfectly, your general ill founded pomposity. Whenever I see that it reminds me of people writing a letter to The Times and believing it makes them look more intelligent than they are. I'm not questioning your intellect, to do that there would have to be some evidence to prove it's existence.
I would be interested what evidence you would like me to provide and related to what? You assume I don't know a lot and that is fine, I really won't lose any sleep. Other people can happily come on here and tell me to **** myself, I have no problem with that whatsoever. They can say what they like but I can also contest it. Please be assured I wasn't fighting the Muslim corner, I was fighting against all of the ignorant comments on here that are quite frankly, disgusting and vile.
The fact that you took that seriously really concerns me pal, are you sure you're ok? You keep coming back with the same kind of responses, you don't want to address what I'm accusing you of being, you simply deny it and move on as if that's enough to satisfy the argument. You claim to 'know quite a bit', but from where I'm sat, you either have trouble putting it into words or you actually don't know very much at all. You specifically said, 'speak to a Muslim' I don't know if you want me to use the word 'assumption' or the word 'inference' here, but can you see what my point is? If you can't I'm fairly sure this one doesn't end well for you going forward on here. You cannot assume, nor infer that people are ill-read or ill-informed on a subject because they have expressed anger and outrage in a post. This forum can be used as a medium to vent, anonymously, and people reserve their rights to come on at a later date and edit a post to state that it may or may not have been an objective opinion, rather it was clouded by their judgement at the time. At the same time they have the right not to do that as well. You DO NOT have the right to come on here and attempt one-upmanship over fellow posters, by declaring your intellectual superiority over them. There's a hidden message for you in there, I suggest you adhere to it and do yourself a massive favour.
Again a childish retort, I use "Sir" all the time, although in a different context than you have stated. You have made an assumption based upon one word, more fool you TBH. If you believe I have no intellect then again you that shows your ignorance. I will not take any offence from someone on an internet forum who refuses to travel to other countries for the reasons you have stated. Put a smiley, try and call me silly names and insults it really doesn't bother me, that is the easy game to play.
I know exactly in which context you posted. "It is you who seems the idiot sir." Dimwits, like yourself, will often address people in that manner and it's always deliberate, if misguided. Just as they'll quote, or more usually misquote, Shakespeare etc, to appear erudite and profound. Sadly it's much like losers who walk into the village and ask, "How goes it gentlemen?" You obviously can't see how foolish you appear which, I have to say, is your only possible excuse.
The lesson for you here is to re-read my posts. I have seen may vitriolic comments on here which are quite frankly disgusting and stink of ignorance. I have never attempted one-upmanship however if you feel threatened by my posts I suggest going to a more suitible discussion. Please do help me though if you decide to stay, can you clarify what you are accusing me of? We can have a debate about religion, you can test me on my knowledge if you don't beleive me however what that will achive is debatable and I am sure the internet does not need to be filled with me trying to convince you.
I would like you to provide statistics that show the proportion of Muslims that are offended by Islamophobia is equal to or greater than the amount of Muslims who are condemning Jihadi Extremists for committing acts of terror around the world. My argument might as well be that now, since I wasn't really arguing your point to begin with, I was more interested in whipping you for showing up like some nancy boy with a whip. I know you're just going to say "Why should they condemn it"... here's the answer to that in advance... Because everybody else is condemning it. That's all. You can't provide the evidence I need, because the ratio is nowhere near directly proportionate, it's not even close.
