Remember when questioning referee performances were killing Scottish football http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/21524-We-need-to-distance-ourselves-from-this-pish
When dignity meant dignity timmy! Edit: That thread had everything that used to be good about not606. Taigs and huns arguing like ****, Indian food and tits.
Vanguard Bears wrote an article on how the dog story was ridiculous and should never be a front page with all that is going on in the world... So far so sane... ...then it became..."the guy who was allegedly attacked...where is the proof...is an Ira supporting racist who takes valium".... after trolling through his Twitter and Facebook accounts for anything to slander him with... Racist = laughing at racist joke Lot of effort for a non story
At the bottom of it, it has his picture (they've called him a rabid republican bigot by then - insert your own h here and there) and invites their fellow mongs to "say hello to him". It says where he lives, what his facebook account is, the names of his friends... ...and this is to "counter" the idea that they're sociopaths???
Expecting anyone on VB to have any shred of self-awareness, self-deprecation or even taking some time to perform introspection on their own actions is a stretch. We should just be glad they evolved past ****ting in their hands and chucking it at us.
All these ****s that are on single team forums are by and large nutters. They tell themselves myth and **** and start believing all their own rubbish.
Simply because it's easier to vacantly agree with fellow *****s than attempt (mostly) rational discourse with poeple who have a differing opinion. I sometimes read the comments on VideoCelts to keep my own opinion on Celtic in perspective.
Or they completely disagree with anyone who has a different, albeit rational, explanation for something, ie. it was the club's own fault for going bust, not Peter Lawwell. These people are usually accused of being timposters and eventually banned.
To be fair it's not only Rangers fans who do that. I was repeatedly accused of being a Hun on 606 because I wouldn't go along with the usual paranoid ****e.
On SSB tonight he asked the question which the media refused to ask. Did SEVCO refuse to sack Black because he would have sung like the proverbial canary. Should the SFA not have asked fat Sally the pie guzzler to name those he referred to. Incidentally, players in Australia are being arrested and banned for life for betting on football.
C'mon SFA in Brownesque fashion Show us the betting slip. C'mon SFA hold an inquiry into fat Sally's allegations. Surely, innocent players at SEVCO etc should have their name cleared. Neil Lennon came out instantly and said he knew of no one at Celtic who was betting on games. As to the William Hill sponsorship......so what! Clubs are sponsored by alcohol companies so is it ok for clubs to distribute beer and whiskey to the players at HT.
Did SEVCO not sack Black because he would have named the others who were betting on football against the SFA regulations. Interestingly that clown Smith had the cheek to say that FROM NOW ONTHE RULE SHOULD BE ENFORCED. Someone maybe Delahunt pointed out that the rule was already clear.
