I agree he isn't as talented as De Gea but he is currently better than him. Once De Gea realises all of his talent and potential he will be far and beyond better than most keepers in the world. As for Lindegaard he's just average at best. And meth...accusing anyone of bias is comical from you.
tbh .. giving England recent history of GKs blunders in the national team.. i can say he will fit well .. thus understand his point
Irdan, so you think Ruddy is better than De Gea, my god, what a load of ****, the same Lindegaard that is in the Denmark squad.
you know that in a test done recently, they mixed words in a sentence answapped letters .. and still a child with average IQ was able to get it .. if you can't get ihoney, it make no surprise why you think your GK is better than Gea this is why you gonna stay a bottom level club and not top we take younger players and give them chance to develop so they become the top players that can carry the club in the long term ... while you rather have an average GK taking the chance over more talented GK just to meet some short term targets .. this is darling why both clubs are in 2 different levels
didn't you miss something in his reply honey? .. it was "Not hard at all to understand" ..why you ignored this part and trying to divert the subject .. class .. what coward
so according to you, Gea is the more talented GK than Ruddy, yet you rather bench Gea and stop him developing leaving him to be rotten on the bench ? is that how you treat your talented players back in Norwich? how the players will develop without playing and making mistakes? ... beside is not like Ruddy is a top class GK or even close? I really don't get your logic i watched most of goals scored against Norwich and half of them could had been saved by Gea tbh
