He's right though, why can't normal fans be critical when pundits can voice good or bad opinions and be paid for the privelage. Football clubs belong to the fans.
Fack awf Neville Gary.
Fack awf Neville Gary.
AFTV
- Thread starter Matth_2014
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
There might be a few bellends on the Arsenal fan TV interviews (pick any club, it would be the same) but the host Robbie Lyle is a legend, and he is spot on. Fans are entitled to their opinions, as they are the ones who go week in week out and pay the players wages. Gary Neville can do one.
Already posted a few days ago. If you didn't keep going into hiding you would have seen that
Already posted a few days ago. If you didn't keep going into hiding you would have seen that
http://metro.co.uk/2016/07/27/arsen...ously-cringey-chant-for-granit-xhaka-6033703/
Neville's probably just bitter towards fans in general after getting booed off the majority of the time while he was in charge at Valencia.
Robbie does what a good interviewer should do and plays Devil's Advocate.There might be a few bellends on the Arsenal fan TV interviews (pick any club, it would be the same) but the host Robbie Lyle is a legend, and he is spot on. Fans are entitled to their opinions, as they are the ones who go week in week out and pay the players wages. Gary Neville can do one.
When he's talking to the Wenger Out people, then he defends the manager.
When he's talking to the Wenger In people, then he criticises the manager and his decisions.
It makes people explain their points and why they feel how they do.
There are loads of bellends on AFTV, but there are two reasons behind that.
The first is that they're entertaining. Moderate, sensible opinions aren't as much fun.
The second is that they're all Arsenal fans!
Robbie does what a good interviewer should do and plays Devil's Advocate.
When he's talking to the Wenger Out people, then he defends the manager.
When he's talking to the Wenger In people, then he criticises the manager and his decisions.
It makes people explain their points and why they feel how they do.
There are loads of bellends on AFTV, but there are two reasons behind that.
The first is that they're entertaining. Moderate, sensible opinions aren't as much fun.
The second is that they're all Arsenal fans!
He's a good interviewer and listening to his personal views, he's fairly well balanced about the situation at Arsenal i.e there are frustrations, but things on the whole are pretty good at our club.
As for the bellend issue, that Spurs video showed that it's not just limited to Arsenal fans
Robbie is cool, DT is cool. I watch his FIFA gameplay videos.
Troopz is a helmet, (Fam, Blud, Fam, Hamroll) but hilarious to watch.
Claude is a decent guy but needs to calm down, or he will give himself a cardiac arrest.
Ty is deluded and moronic, and dresses like a complete helmet.
Moh is a despicable sack of ****
Noticed Moh never came to the game at the Bridge.
Too many Chelsea wide boys looking to slice him up.
Whilst I do not advocate violence, no one could say he hadn't bought it on himself with the Right wing nutjob element of our fanbase.
Troopz is a helmet, (Fam, Blud, Fam, Hamroll) but hilarious to watch.
Claude is a decent guy but needs to calm down, or he will give himself a cardiac arrest.
Ty is deluded and moronic, and dresses like a complete helmet.
Moh is a despicable sack of ****
Noticed Moh never came to the game at the Bridge.
Too many Chelsea wide boys looking to slice him up.
Whilst I do not advocate violence, no one could say he hadn't bought it on himself with the Right wing nutjob element of our fanbase.
I think you need to clarify this sentence. Are you saying that he's brought it on himself because he's Asian and articulate ? Are you criticising the right wing element of your club ? (because it sounds as though you are by calling them nutters) But I'm confused as to how you think Moh has justified a kicking from the right wing nutters at Chelsea ?
Moh is an absolute bell end, but probably does not deserve a kicking...
On second thoughts he is a first-class card-carrying back-to-front!
As I mentioned in another thread, thats not what i was saying.
Moh is just a big mouth **** who needs to keep his mouth shut.
Him being Asian and articulate has nothing to do with it from my view point, I just think he is an absolute ****, regardless of his race.
It was the kicking from right wing nutters, that he 'brought on himself', that needed clarifying, but fair enough you did that on another thread
He blasphemed against Chelsea's heritage and some meat heads think that's OK to put him in a coma given half a chance. Bo reckons he knows what he's getting into by making such comments so only has himself to blame. Hence Moh missing the game at the Fridge.
I left it at
He blasphemed against Chelsea's heritage and some meat heads think that's OK to put him in a coma given half a chance. Bo reckons he knows what he's getting into by making such comments so only has himself to blame. Hence Moh missing the game at the Fridge.
I left it at
Moh is a cock, but he's entitled to say whatever he wants about Chelsea (for the record, he's pretty spot on about them) That's no excuse for some knuckle dragging ****tards to give him a kicking. Saying he would have 'brought it on himself' and claiming not to endorse violence in the same sentence, doesn't stack up.
To me it doesn't stack up either, but its been a tiresome few days on here so I thought forget it. It'll only end up with another @Bodanki from me.
I've just seen the video where he says that Chelsea were obviously going to be linked with child abuse.
That's probably crossing the line a bit, even for that lot!
That's probably crossing the line a bit, even for that lot!
I've just seen the video where he says that Chelsea were obviously going to be linked with child abuse.
That's probably crossing the line a bit, even for that lot!
That was out of order to be fair.