Easy in hindsight, but does anyone else think that Ole's choice of starting 11 contributed to the dropping of two points rather than the gaining of just the one.
I was surprised by the defensive set up with Gunnar included instead of a more creative player, and Fabio in the right hand midfield slot. Maybe the plan was to hold it steady and go for a 1-0 win with a break-out counter attacking game, but once again I thought we handed the intiative to them.
They were all over us for 20 minutes - we went 2-0 down and gave ourselves a mountain to climb. No offence meant, but I don't see Brom as deserving of that sort of respect. We should have started with the team that finished - Whitts on for Medel was a forced decision.
Pulis will bring Palace to defend the point they start with - how should Ole tackle that?
I was surprised by the defensive set up with Gunnar included instead of a more creative player, and Fabio in the right hand midfield slot. Maybe the plan was to hold it steady and go for a 1-0 win with a break-out counter attacking game, but once again I thought we handed the intiative to them.
They were all over us for 20 minutes - we went 2-0 down and gave ourselves a mountain to climb. No offence meant, but I don't see Brom as deserving of that sort of respect. We should have started with the team that finished - Whitts on for Medel was a forced decision.
Pulis will bring Palace to defend the point they start with - how should Ole tackle that?